EUS-guided shear wave elastography for fibrosis screening in patients with obesity and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease: a pilot study (with video)

Liver fibrosis staging is challenging in patients with obesity and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Liver biopsies are invasive, whereas noninvasive tests such as vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) can be inaccurate in patients with obesity. We hypoth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2025-02, Vol.101 (2), p.456-462.e1
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Thomas J., Jirapinyo, Pichamol, Shah, Raj, Schuster, Kimberly, Papke, David J., Thompson, Christopher C., Doyon, Laura, Lautz, David B., Ryou, Marvin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Liver fibrosis staging is challenging in patients with obesity and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Liver biopsies are invasive, whereas noninvasive tests such as vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) can be inaccurate in patients with obesity. We hypothesized that EUS-guided shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) is more accurate for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity; the aim of this pilot study was to test this hypothesis and establish optimal fibrosis stage cutoffs for EUS-SWE. This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study from prospectively collected data. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-SWE with subsequent liver biopsy were included. EUS-SWE was compared with Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and VCTE. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was performed, and 90% sensitivity and specific cutoffs were calculated to determine optimal cutoffs. Sixty-two patients were included. Mean body mass index was 40.74 kg/m2. EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 in discriminating significant fibrosis (F2; AUROC, .87 vs .61; P < .0048) and advanced fibrosis (F3; AUROC, .93 vs .63; P < .0001), but not cirrhosis (F4; AUROC, .95 vs .81; P = .099). EUS-SWE was superior to VCTE in predicting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (P = .0067 and P = .0022, respectively). The 90% sensitivity cutoffs for EUS-SWE were 7.50, 8.48, and 11.30 for F2, F3, and F4, and the 90% specificity cutoffs were 9.82, 10.20, and 14.60. In this pilot study, EUS-SWE was superior to FIB-4 and VCTE for liver fibrosis staging in patients with MASLD and obesity. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05728697.)
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.054