Factors affecting the risk of trismus following maxillary ablative surgery comparing free flap reconstruction to prosthetic obturation: a retrospective observational study
The reconstruction of post-ablative maxillary defects is controversial. It is accepted that quality of life indicators are poorer for maxillary reconstruction compared with mandibular reconstruction. One factor highlighted is that of post-treatment trismus. Rates of trismus are reviewed comparing fr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2024-12, Vol.62 (10), p.937-943 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The reconstruction of post-ablative maxillary defects is controversial. It is accepted that quality of life indicators are poorer for maxillary reconstruction compared with mandibular reconstruction. One factor highlighted is that of post-treatment trismus. Rates of trismus are reviewed comparing free tissue transfer to that of prosthetic obturation. A retrospective review was undertaken comparing rates of trismus at twelve months post-surgery between free tissue transfer and prosthetic obturation. A total of 85 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. Both reconstruction techniques were significant for developing trismus, with a higher rate in the free flap reconstruction cohort than the prosthetic obturation cohort by a factor of 2.51. Modern reconstructive head and neck surgery has moved away from ‘filling a hole’ to a more bespoke, patient-specific reconstruction. The evidence presented here should allow the reconstructive surgeon to better discuss outcomes with patients when considering surgical options for Class II maxillary defects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0266-4356 1532-1940 1532-1940 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.09.005 |