Effects of exercise referral schemes enhanced with behavioural self-management strategies on functional capacity and self-reported disability in community-dwelling older adults. Secondary results from the SITLESS multi-country, three-armed randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Exercise referral schemes (ERS) are an effective strategy for increasing physical activity (PA) in older adults. Behavioural self-management strategies (SMS) may augment the maintenance of PA and associated benefits in this population, resulting in preservation of the functional...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Age and ageing 2024-10, Vol.53 (10)
Hauptverfasser: Olsen, Pia Ø, Tully, Mark A, del Pozo Cruz, Borja, Giné-Garriga, Maria, Coll-Planas, Laura, Roqué, Marta, Rothenbacher, Dietrich, Dallmeier, Dhayana, Sansano-Nadal, Oriol, Blackburn, Nicole E, Wilson, Jason J, Skjødt, Mathias, Caserotti, Paolo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Exercise referral schemes (ERS) are an effective strategy for increasing physical activity (PA) in older adults. Behavioural self-management strategies (SMS) may augment the maintenance of PA and associated benefits in this population, resulting in preservation of the functional capacity and prevention of disability over the long-term. Aim The primary aim was to investigate the long-term (22-months) effects of ERS enhanced with SMS on functional capacity assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) compared to ERS (primary comparison) and a control condition (CTRL). Secondarily, between-group effects after 4 and 16 months on the SPPB and self-reported disability outcomes were investigated. Methods 1360 physically inactive community-dwelling older adults ≥65 years from four European countries were randomized into (i) 16 weeks ERS enhanced with SMS (ERS-SMS), (ii) ERS alone and (iii) CTRL. In addition to SPPB, self-reported function and disability were assessed by the short-form late life function and disability index and with a six-item activity of daily living questionnaire. Results No long-term effects were found for the SPPB-score in ERS-SMS vs ERS (0.21 point, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.46]). Significant group × time effects were observed for the SPPB-score after 4 months in favour of ERS-SMS over CTRL (0.51 point, 95% CI [0.29, 0.73]) and ERS (0.46 point, 95% CI [0.24, 0.68]). Conclusion The study did demonstrate differences, in favour of ERS + SMS, but on SPPB these were small, and not sustained over time. The additional effect of SMS was inconsistent and uncertain.
ISSN:0002-0729
1468-2834
1468-2834
DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae225