Effects of exercise referral schemes enhanced with behavioural self-management strategies on functional capacity and self-reported disability in community-dwelling older adults. Secondary results from the SITLESS multi-country, three-armed randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Exercise referral schemes (ERS) are an effective strategy for increasing physical activity (PA) in older adults. Behavioural self-management strategies (SMS) may augment the maintenance of PA and associated benefits in this population, resulting in preservation of the functional...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Age and ageing 2024-10, Vol.53 (10) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
Exercise referral schemes (ERS) are an effective strategy for increasing physical activity (PA) in older adults. Behavioural self-management strategies (SMS) may augment the maintenance of PA and associated benefits in this population, resulting in preservation of the functional capacity and prevention of disability over the long-term.
Aim
The primary aim was to investigate the long-term (22-months) effects of ERS enhanced with SMS on functional capacity assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) compared to ERS (primary comparison) and a control condition (CTRL).
Secondarily, between-group effects after 4 and 16 months on the SPPB and self-reported disability outcomes were investigated.
Methods
1360 physically inactive community-dwelling older adults ≥65 years from four European countries were randomized into (i) 16 weeks ERS enhanced with SMS (ERS-SMS), (ii) ERS alone and (iii) CTRL. In addition to SPPB, self-reported function and disability were assessed by the short-form late life function and disability index and with a six-item activity of daily living questionnaire.
Results
No long-term effects were found for the SPPB-score in ERS-SMS vs ERS (0.21 point, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.46]). Significant group × time effects were observed for the SPPB-score after 4 months in favour of ERS-SMS over CTRL (0.51 point, 95% CI [0.29, 0.73]) and ERS (0.46 point, 95% CI [0.24, 0.68]).
Conclusion
The study did demonstrate differences, in favour of ERS + SMS, but on SPPB these were small, and not sustained over time. The additional effect of SMS was inconsistent and uncertain. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-0729 1468-2834 1468-2834 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ageing/afae225 |