Association between the High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and the Long-term Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis
Aim: We aimed to determine whether baseline high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) at the time of coronary angiography (CAG) could serve as a prognostic marker for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) through a sys...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis 2024, pp.65171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim: We aimed to determine whether baseline high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) at the time of coronary angiography (CAG) could serve as a prognostic marker for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods: The MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were used for data collection. As of April 2024, 2,871 studies have been identified. Clinical studies comparing MACEs over an observational interval exceeding 12 months in patients with angiographically defined CAD with estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of MACEs in the higher or top-quartile HDL-CEC (H-HDL-CEC) group compared with the lower or bottom-quartile HDL-CEC (L-HDL-CEC) group, after adjusting for six confounding variables, including HDL-C, were included. HRs of 1) overall cardiovascular outcomes, composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, any coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality (Model-1), and 2) cardiovascular outcomes excluding all-cause mortality from Model-1 (Model-2), compared between the L-HDL-CEC and H-HDL-CEC groups, were estimated using a random-effects model, respectively.Results: In five studies, 5,725 patients with CAD with a mean observational interval of 4.9 years were included. The H-HDL-CEC group had significantly lower risks for both estimates (Model-1: HR: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18–0.63 [p=0.0005], and I2=59.8% [p=0.04]; Model-2: HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13–0.60 [p=0.0013], and I2=64% [p=0.04]).Conclusion: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between the baseline HDL-CECs on CAG and long-term MACEs in CAD patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1340-3478 1880-3873 1880-3873 |
DOI: | 10.5551/jat.65171 |