Association of Muscle Strength With All‐Cause Mortality in the Oldest Old: Prospective Cohort Study From 28 Countries

ABSTRACT Background Ageing is associated with a gradual loss of muscle strength, which in the end may have consequences for survival. Whether muscle strength and mortality risk associate in a gradual or threshold‐specific manner remains unclear. This study investigates the prospective association of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle sarcopenia and muscle, 2024-12, Vol.15 (6), p.2756-2764
Hauptverfasser: Andersen, Lars Louis, López‐Bueno, Rubén, Núñez‐Cortés, Rodrigo, Cadore, Eduardo Lusa, Polo‐López, Ana, Calatayud, Joaquín
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Background Ageing is associated with a gradual loss of muscle strength, which in the end may have consequences for survival. Whether muscle strength and mortality risk associate in a gradual or threshold‐specific manner remains unclear. This study investigates the prospective association of muscle strength with all‐cause mortality in the oldest old. Methods We included 1890 adults aged ≥ 90 years (61.6% women, mean age 91.0 ± 1.5 years) from 27 European countries and Israel participating in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) study. Muscle strength was assessed using handgrip dynamometry (unit: kilogram). Using time‐varying Cox regression with restricted cubic splines, we determined the prospective association of muscle strength with mortality, controlling for age, sex, smoking, BMI, marital status, education, geographical region and self‐perceived health. Results Over a mean follow‐up of 4.2 ± 2.4 years, more than half of the participants died (n = 971, 51.4%). The mean handgrip strength was 20.4 ± 8.0 kg for all participants, with men (26.7 ± 7.5 kg) showing significantly higher strength than women (16.4 ± 5.4 kg) (p 
ISSN:2190-5991
2190-6009
2190-6009
DOI:10.1002/jcsm.13619