The IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT): multicenter pig study on the effect of ischemic preconditioning

Numerous cardioprotective interventions have been reported to reduce myocardial infarct size (IS) in pre-clinical studies. However, their translation for the benefit of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been largely disappointing. One reason for the lack of translation is the lack...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Basic research in cardiology 2024-12, Vol.119 (6), p.893-909
Hauptverfasser: Kleinbongard, Petra, Arriola, Carlos Galán, Badimon, Lina, Crisostomo, Veronica, Giricz, Zoltán, Gyöngyösi, Mariann, Heusch, Gerd, Ibanez, Borja, Kiss, Attila, de Kleijn, Dominique P. V., Podesser, Bruno K., Carracedo, Rafael Ramírez, Rodríguez-Sinovas, Antonio, Ruiz-Meana, Marisol, Sanchez Margallo, Francisco M., Vilahur, Gemma, Zamorano, José Luis, Zaragoza, Carlos, Ferdinandy, Peter, Hausenloy, Derek J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Numerous cardioprotective interventions have been reported to reduce myocardial infarct size (IS) in pre-clinical studies. However, their translation for the benefit of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been largely disappointing. One reason for the lack of translation is the lack of rigor and reproducibility in pre-clinical studies. To address this, we have established the European IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) pig AMI network with centralized randomization and blinded core laboratory IS analysis and validated the network with ischemic preconditioning (IPC) as a positive control. Ten sites in the COST Innovators Grant (IG16225) network participated in the IMPACT network. Three sites were excluded from the final analysis through quality control of infarct images and use of pre-defined exclusion criteria. Using a centrally generated randomization list, pigs were allocated to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R, N  = 5/site) or IPC + I/R ( N  = 5/site). The primary endpoint was IS [% area-at-risk (AAR)], as quantified by triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride (TTC) staining in a centralized, blinded core laboratory (5 sites), or IS [% left-ventricular mass (LV)], as quantified by a centralized, blinded cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) core laboratory (2 sites). In pooled analyses, IPC significantly reduced IS when compared to I/R (57 ± 14 versus 32 ± 19 [%AAR] N  = 25 pigs/group; p  
ISSN:1435-1803
0300-8428
1435-1803
DOI:10.1007/s00395-024-01083-9