In vivo pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and brain concentration comparison of fentanyl and para-fluorofentanyl in rats

In 2022, para-fluorofentanyl (pFF) rose to the 6th most reported drug and the most reported fentanyl analog in the United States according to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). pFF differs from fentanyl by the addition of a single fluorine group. To date, pFF has not been extensively evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of toxicology 2024-10
Hauptverfasser: Canfield, Jeremy R, Sprague, Jon E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In 2022, para-fluorofentanyl (pFF) rose to the 6th most reported drug and the most reported fentanyl analog in the United States according to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). pFF differs from fentanyl by the addition of a single fluorine group. To date, pFF has not been extensively evaluated in vivo and is frequently seen in combination with fentanyl. In the present study, the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and brain region-specific concentrations of pFF were evaluated in male Sprague-Dawley rats and compared to fentanyl. A 300 μg/kg subcutaneous dose of fentanyl or pFF was administered to assess PD and PK parameters as well as brain region concentrations. PD parameters were evaluated via a tail flick test to evaluate analgesia and core body temperature to measure hypothermia, a surrogate marker of overall opioid toxicity. Fentanyl and pFF were found to be equally active at the tested dose in terms of tail flick response with both compounds producing an analgesic response that lasted up to 240 min post-drug treatment. pFF induced a significantly greater hypothermic effect compared to fentanyl with a maximum temperature decrease of -5.6 ℃. Plasma PK parameters (T , AUC, etc.) did not differ between fentanyl and pFF. However, pFF concentrations in the medulla, hippocampus, frontal cortex and striatum were more than two times the fentanyl concentrations. The increase in brain concentrations and greater hypothermic effect suggests that pFF is potentially more dangerous than fentanyl.
ISSN:0340-5761
1432-0738
1432-0738
DOI:10.1007/s00204-024-03887-z