Impact of prior hospitalization for heart failure on clinical outcomes of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with new‐generation devices: Insights from the LAPLACE‐TAVI registry

Background A history of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with the prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the impact of prior HHF on clinical outcomes after contem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2024-12, Vol.104 (7), p.1469-1476
Hauptverfasser: Fukutomi, Motoki, Onishi, Takayuki, Ando, Tomo, Higuchi, Ryosuke, Hagiya, Kenichi, Saji, Mike, Takamisawa, Itaru, Iguchi, Nobuo, Takayama, Morimasa, Shimizu, Atsushi, Shimizu, Jun, Doi, Shinichiro, Okazaki, Shinya, Sato, Kei, Tamura, Harutoshi, Yokoyama, Hiroaki, Takanashi, Shuichiro, Tobaru, Tetsuya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background A history of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with the prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the impact of prior HHF on clinical outcomes after contemporary TAVI using new‐generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) has not been thoroughly investigated. Methods Using data from the aLliAnce for exPloring cLinical prospects of AortiC valvE disease (LAPLACE)‐TAVI registry, we investigated 2,752 patients who underwent TAVI with new‐generation THVs with a median follow‐up of 627 days. The primary outcomes were all‐cause mortality and heart failure readmission after TAVI. Results Patients with a history of HHF (n = 809) showed a higher 30‐day mortality than patients without prior HHF (n = 1,943). A Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the prior HHF group showed a higher incidence of the primary outcome than the non‐prior HHF group (27.4% vs. 16.4%, log‐rank p = 0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, prior HHF was significantly associated with the risk of the primary outcome, even after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio, 1.344; 95% confidence interval, 1.103–1.638; p = 0.003). A subanalysis showed that the prior HHF group with ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% had a higher risk of the primary outcome than the non‐prior HHF group, whereas the prior HHF group with EF 
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.31261