Cost‐effectiveness of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy in Japan

Aim To assess the cost‐effectiveness of diabetic nephropathy treatment with sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in Japanese clinical practice, considering diabetes‐related complications. Materials and Methods A population‐based Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the cost‐effectiveness for people with diabetic nephropathy who initiated pharmacotherapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor plus conventional treatment or conventional treatment alone, based on quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) and healthcare costs. The Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation study (CREDENCE) and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Research statistical survey were the primary sources of probability and mortality, while Japanese Health Insurance Claims Data were the cost source. The state transition model included diabetic nephropathy, hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease, dialysis, and death. One‐way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to explore model uncertainty. Results Using the threshold of JPY 5 000 000 per QALY, SGLT2 inhibitor plus conventional treatment was more cost‐effective than conventional treatment alone, with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of JPY 654 309 per QALY. Treating 100 000 people, SGLT2 inhibitor plus conventional treatment prevented 2234 deaths and reduced 5793 fewer heart failure cases, 3967 fewer myocardial infarctions and stroke events. Sensitivity analysis affirmed the robustness of these results for patients aged under 70 years. Conclusions The SGLT2 inhibitor treatment appeared to be cost‐effective for the overall population of our study and particularly for younger patients (