Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Nursing Delirium Screening Scale Versus Confusion Assessment Method for Postoperative Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
ABSTRACT Aims To synthesise the evidence on and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Nu‐DESC and CAM in detecting postoperative delirium among hospitalised patients. Design Systematic review and diagnostic meta‐analysis. Data Sources The PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied He...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical nursing 2025-01, Vol.34 (1), p.287-298 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT
Aims
To synthesise the evidence on and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Nu‐DESC and CAM in detecting postoperative delirium among hospitalised patients.
Design
Systematic review and diagnostic meta‐analysis.
Data Sources
The PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched from their inception to February 10, 2023.
Results
In total, 10 (n = 1950) and seven (n = 830) reports were included for the Nu‐DESC and CAM, respectively. For Nu‐DESC and CAM, the pooled sensitivities were 0.69 and 0.65, respectively, while the summary specificities were 0.99 for Nu‐DESC and 0.92 for CAM. The pooled specificity differed significantly between the two tools (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0962-1067 1365-2702 1365-2702 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jocn.17467 |