Does performing a Point-Of-Care HbA1c test increase the chances of undertaking an OGTT among individuals at risk of diabetes? A randomized controlled trial
Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus is key to reducing micro and macrovascular complications associated with this disease. However, a lab-based process for diagnosis entails the risk of loss-to-follow-up. The objective of this study was to demonstrate if performing a point-of-care test of Hb...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Primary care diabetes 2024-12, Vol.18 (6), p.624-631 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus is key to reducing micro and macrovascular complications associated with this disease. However, a lab-based process for diagnosis entails the risk of loss-to-follow-up. The objective of this study was to demonstrate if performing a point-of-care test of HbA1c immediately after a screening questionnaire will increase the proportion of individuals showing up for a lab-based confirmatory test as Point-of-care (POC) provides immediate availability, which is expected to reduce loss-to-follow-up.
This trial was a two-arm, randomized controlled, open-label study. Participants were recruited using the FINDRISC Score in a primary care and community setting. All 902 eligible participants were randomized into the intervention (n=511) and control (n=391) group. The intervention group was given information on healthy lifestyles, and a Point-of-care POC-HbA1c test was performed during the same visit. The control group was only given information on healthy lifestyles. Participants in both groups received a written prescription to have an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed within the next 30 days. Follow-up phone calls were made at 30 and 90 days to check if participant had undergone the test. The total duration of the intervention was 8 months. The posterior data analysis was made by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test for the quantitative variables, and the descriptive statistics were expressed as means and standard deviation, or median and interquartile range 25 %-75 %, as appropriate.
At 30 days, 28 % of participants in the intervention group and 26.1 % in the control group undertook the OGTT (RD 1.90 %; 95 % CI −3.94; 7.73). At 90 days, 35.8 % of participants in the intervention group and 37.1 % in the control group undertook the OGTT. There was no statistically significant difference (RD – 3.17 %; 95 % CI −7.04; 0.70) between both groups.
The data suggest that performing a POC-HbA1c test after the FINDRISC did not increase the percentage of individuals showing up for the OGTT.
•This study aimed at adding scientific evidence about how to improve early detection of type 2 diabetes.•We tried to answer whether applying a screening questionnaire followed by a POC-HbA1c test to those identified as at risk of diabetes increases the number of patients who undergo a confirmatory test.•Performing a POC-HbA1c test after the FINDRISC did not increase the percentage of individuals showing up for the OGTT |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1751-9918 1878-0210 1878-0210 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pcd.2024.09.005 |