Prospective cohort study to evaluate narrow diameter implants for the restoration of a missing maxillary lateral incisor in patients with a cleft palate: Five-year results

The maxillary lateral incisor is often congenitally missing in patients with a cleft palate. The congenital cleft presents the practitioner with challenges including quantity and quality of bone, a surgically managed cleft correction, and limited clinical space. The purpose of this investigation was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2024-09
Hauptverfasser: Knobloch, Lisa A., Larsen, Peter, Gohel, Anita, McGlumphy, Edwin, Messner, Robin, Johnston, William, Saponaro, Paola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The maxillary lateral incisor is often congenitally missing in patients with a cleft palate. The congenital cleft presents the practitioner with challenges including quantity and quality of bone, a surgically managed cleft correction, and limited clinical space. The purpose of this investigation was to calculate the 5-year success and survival rate of narrow-diameter implants used to restore a missing lateral incisor in patients with a cleft palate. Fourteen study participants with a cleft palate and a missing maxillary lateral incisor were enrolled based on established criteria. Seventeen narrow-diameter implants (AstraTech OsseoSpeed 3.0S and OsseoSpeed TX 3.5 mm) were placed using a 2-stage protocol and restored with a custom titanium abutment and a cement-retained crown. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed annually for 5 years. Four probe depth measurements were measured and evaluated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests. Radiographic marginal bone loss was measured annually using a digital subtraction technique and evaluated with ANCOVA, and the least square mean was derived. The restoration was evaluated using Pink (PES) and White (WES) Esthetic scores. Regarding probing depth measurements, a significant variance was found between the 4 locations (P
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
1097-6841
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.048