New Sources of Resistance to Terbinafine Revealed and Squalene Epoxidase Modelled in the Dermatophyte Fungus Trichophyton interdigitale From Australia

ABSTRACT Background Terbinafine is widely used to treat onychomycosis caused by dermatophyte fungi. Terbinafine resistance in recent years is causing concern. Resistance has so far been associated with single‐nucleotide substitutions in the DNA sequence of the enzyme squalene epoxidase (SQLE) but ho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mycoses 2024-09, Vol.67 (9), p.e13795-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Mechidi, Phemelo, Holien, Jessica, Grando, Danilla, Huynh, Tien, Lawrie, Ann C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Background Terbinafine is widely used to treat onychomycosis caused by dermatophyte fungi. Terbinafine resistance in recent years is causing concern. Resistance has so far been associated with single‐nucleotide substitutions in the DNA sequence of the enzyme squalene epoxidase (SQLE) but how this affects SQLE functionality is not understood. Objectives The aim of this study was to understand newly discovered resistance in two Australian strains of Trichophyton interdigitale. Patients/Methods Resistance to terbinafine was tested in four newly isolated strains. Three‐dimensional SQLE models were prepared to investigate how the structure of their SQLE affected the binding of terbinafine. Results This study found the first Australian occurrences of terbinafine resistance in two T. interdigitale strains. Both strains had novel deletion mutations in erg1 and frameshifts during translation. Three‐dimensional models had smaller SQLE proteins and open reading frames as well as fewer C‐terminal α‐helices than susceptible strains. In susceptible strains, the lipophilic tail of terbinafine was predicted to dock stably into a hydrophobic pocket in SQLE lined by over 20 hydrophobic amino acids. In resistant strains, molecular dynamics simulations showed that terbinafine docking was unstable and so terbinafine did not block squalene metabolism and ultimately ergosterol production. The resistant reference strain ATCC MYA‐4438 T. rubrum showed a single erg1 mutation that resulted in frameshift during translation, leading to C‐terminal helix deletion. Conclusions Modelling their effects on their SQLE proteins will aid in the design of potential new treatments for these novel resistant strains, which pose clinical problems in treating dermatophyte infections with terbinafine.
ISSN:0933-7407
1439-0507
1439-0507
DOI:10.1111/myc.13795