Controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage effectively decreases the need for second and third tier interventions for intracranial hypertension in severe traumatic brain injury patients
•Management of refractory intracranial hypertension in severe TBI patients is challenging.•The cost-benefit ratio of the current second- and third tier interventions is questionable.•Controlled lumbar liquor drainage is a potent ICP lowering intervention and may decrease the need of additional 2nd a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2024-09, Vol.55, p.111337, Article 111337 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Management of refractory intracranial hypertension in severe TBI patients is challenging.•The cost-benefit ratio of the current second- and third tier interventions is questionable.•Controlled lumbar liquor drainage is a potent ICP lowering intervention and may decrease the need of additional 2nd and 3rd tier therapies.
Early treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is a cornerstone of the therapy in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Treatment of refractory high ICP however, remain challenging as only limited and risky third-tier therapeutic interventions are available. Controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage has been known as an efficient method of ICP reduction after TBI for decades, but it is not recommended in international guidelines because of low evidence background and safety issues. Our centre has a long-standing experience using this intervention for more than 15 years. Here we present our data about the safety and efficacy of controlled lumbar drainage to avoid further second- and third tier ICP lowering therapies and beneficially influence functional outcome.
Observational (retrospective and prospective) analysis was performed using demographic, clinical and outcome data of severe TBI patients admitted to our centre. Analysis was retrospective between 2008 and 2013 and prospective from 2014 to 2019. Only severe TBI patients (GCS20 Hgmm) within one day (10 vs 2) were reduced. The need of additional second- and third-line therapies (deep sedation, hyperventilation, barbiturate administration, decompressive craniectomy) also significantly decreased (60 vs 25 interventions, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1383 1879-0267 1879-0267 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111337 |