Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation
The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated. The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperba...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diving and hyperbaric medicine 2024-09, Vol.54 (3), p.212-216 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 216 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 212 |
container_title | Diving and hyperbaric medicine |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Wang, Cong Yu, Qiuhong Liu, Yaling Ren, Ziqi Liu, Ying Xue, Lianbi |
description | The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated.
The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperbaric chamber. The inspiratory pressure (PI) of the ventilator was set to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 kPa (approximately 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cmH₂O). The compliance and resistance of the test lung were set to 200 mL·kPa⁻¹ and 2 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹, respectively. Experiments were conducted at 101, 203 and 284 kPa ambient pressure (1.0, 2.0 and 2.8 atmospheres absolute respectively). At each of the 5 PI values, the tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and peak inspiratory flow (Fpeak) displayed by the ventilator and the test lung were recorded for 20 cycles. Test lung data were considered the actual ventilation values. The ventilation data were compared among the three groups to evaluate the stability of the ventilator.
At every PI, the Ppeak detected by the ventilator decreased slightly with increasing ambient pressure. The Fpeak values measured by the test lung decreased substantially as the ambient pressure increased. Nevertheless, the reduction in VT at 284 kPa and PI 30 cmH₂O (compared to performance at 101 kPa) was comparatively small (approximately 60 ml).
In PCV mode this ventilator provided relatively stable VT across clinically relevant PI values to ambient pressures as high as 284 kPa. However, because Fpeak decreases at higher ambient pressure, some user adjustment might be necessary for precise VT maintenance during clinical use at higher PIs and ambient pressures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.28920/dhm54.3.212-216 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106459667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3106459667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c182t-7319113b46b8b997d9eca0b2e810205e1ef4d6b420f052b786cc7a60e5921b583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EoqWwM6GMLCl-xI49oqo8pEosIEbLdm7aoCQOdlLovydqS4eru3znDAehW4LnVCqKH4pNw7M5m1NCU0rEGZpSilVKMkXO0ZRIxlLGiZigqxi_MOYZE_wSTZiicuTFFH0ut6YeTF_5NvFlYpIWfpLNroNgTahc4n93a2iTLbR9VZveh6QYQtWuky5AjEOA1Pm2D76uoTitRtk1uihNHeHm-Gfo42n5vnhJV2_Pr4vHVeqIpH2aM6IIYTYTVlql8kKBM9hSkARTzIFAmRXCZhSXmFObS-FcbgQGriixXLIZuj94u-C_B4i9bqrooK5NC36ImhEsMq6EyMcpPkxd8DEGKHUXqsaEnSZY73PqfU7N9JhzPDEid0f7YBsoTsB_P_YHqwVx-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106459667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Cong ; Yu, Qiuhong ; Liu, Yaling ; Ren, Ziqi ; Liu, Ying ; Xue, Lianbi</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cong ; Yu, Qiuhong ; Liu, Yaling ; Ren, Ziqi ; Liu, Ying ; Xue, Lianbi ; Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), No. 89 Taoyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518052, China ; Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, A zone, No.199 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China</creatorcontrib><description>The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated.
The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperbaric chamber. The inspiratory pressure (PI) of the ventilator was set to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 kPa (approximately 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cmH₂O). The compliance and resistance of the test lung were set to 200 mL·kPa⁻¹ and 2 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹, respectively. Experiments were conducted at 101, 203 and 284 kPa ambient pressure (1.0, 2.0 and 2.8 atmospheres absolute respectively). At each of the 5 PI values, the tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and peak inspiratory flow (Fpeak) displayed by the ventilator and the test lung were recorded for 20 cycles. Test lung data were considered the actual ventilation values. The ventilation data were compared among the three groups to evaluate the stability of the ventilator.
At every PI, the Ppeak detected by the ventilator decreased slightly with increasing ambient pressure. The Fpeak values measured by the test lung decreased substantially as the ambient pressure increased. Nevertheless, the reduction in VT at 284 kPa and PI 30 cmH₂O (compared to performance at 101 kPa) was comparatively small (approximately 60 ml).
In PCV mode this ventilator provided relatively stable VT across clinically relevant PI values to ambient pressures as high as 284 kPa. However, because Fpeak decreases at higher ambient pressure, some user adjustment might be necessary for precise VT maintenance during clinical use at higher PIs and ambient pressures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1833-3516</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2209-1491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2209-1491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.28920/dhm54.3.212-216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39288926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Atmosphere Exposure Chambers ; Atmospheric Pressure ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Hyperbaric Oxygenation - methods ; Lung Compliance - physiology ; Maximal Respiratory Pressures ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods ; Pressure ; Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Tidal Volume - physiology ; Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2024-09, Vol.54 (3), p.212-216</ispartof><rights>Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39288926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qiuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yaling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Ziqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Lianbi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), No. 89 Taoyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518052, China</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, A zone, No.199 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation</title><title>Diving and hyperbaric medicine</title><addtitle>Diving Hyperb Med</addtitle><description>The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated.
The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperbaric chamber. The inspiratory pressure (PI) of the ventilator was set to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 kPa (approximately 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cmH₂O). The compliance and resistance of the test lung were set to 200 mL·kPa⁻¹ and 2 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹, respectively. Experiments were conducted at 101, 203 and 284 kPa ambient pressure (1.0, 2.0 and 2.8 atmospheres absolute respectively). At each of the 5 PI values, the tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and peak inspiratory flow (Fpeak) displayed by the ventilator and the test lung were recorded for 20 cycles. Test lung data were considered the actual ventilation values. The ventilation data were compared among the three groups to evaluate the stability of the ventilator.
At every PI, the Ppeak detected by the ventilator decreased slightly with increasing ambient pressure. The Fpeak values measured by the test lung decreased substantially as the ambient pressure increased. Nevertheless, the reduction in VT at 284 kPa and PI 30 cmH₂O (compared to performance at 101 kPa) was comparatively small (approximately 60 ml).
In PCV mode this ventilator provided relatively stable VT across clinically relevant PI values to ambient pressures as high as 284 kPa. However, because Fpeak decreases at higher ambient pressure, some user adjustment might be necessary for precise VT maintenance during clinical use at higher PIs and ambient pressures.</description><subject>Atmosphere Exposure Chambers</subject><subject>Atmospheric Pressure</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperbaric Oxygenation - methods</subject><subject>Lung Compliance - physiology</subject><subject>Maximal Respiratory Pressures</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Tidal Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><issn>1833-3516</issn><issn>2209-1491</issn><issn>2209-1491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EoqWwM6GMLCl-xI49oqo8pEosIEbLdm7aoCQOdlLovydqS4eru3znDAehW4LnVCqKH4pNw7M5m1NCU0rEGZpSilVKMkXO0ZRIxlLGiZigqxi_MOYZE_wSTZiicuTFFH0ut6YeTF_5NvFlYpIWfpLNroNgTahc4n93a2iTLbR9VZveh6QYQtWuky5AjEOA1Pm2D76uoTitRtk1uihNHeHm-Gfo42n5vnhJV2_Pr4vHVeqIpH2aM6IIYTYTVlql8kKBM9hSkARTzIFAmRXCZhSXmFObS-FcbgQGriixXLIZuj94u-C_B4i9bqrooK5NC36ImhEsMq6EyMcpPkxd8DEGKHUXqsaEnSZY73PqfU7N9JhzPDEid0f7YBsoTsB_P_YHqwVx-w</recordid><startdate>20240930</startdate><enddate>20240930</enddate><creator>Wang, Cong</creator><creator>Yu, Qiuhong</creator><creator>Liu, Yaling</creator><creator>Ren, Ziqi</creator><creator>Liu, Ying</creator><creator>Xue, Lianbi</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240930</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation</title><author>Wang, Cong ; Yu, Qiuhong ; Liu, Yaling ; Ren, Ziqi ; Liu, Ying ; Xue, Lianbi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c182t-7319113b46b8b997d9eca0b2e810205e1ef4d6b420f052b786cc7a60e5921b583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere Exposure Chambers</topic><topic>Atmospheric Pressure</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperbaric Oxygenation - methods</topic><topic>Lung Compliance - physiology</topic><topic>Maximal Respiratory Pressures</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Tidal Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Ventilators, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qiuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yaling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Ziqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Lianbi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), No. 89 Taoyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518052, China</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, A zone, No.199 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diving and hyperbaric medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Cong</au><au>Yu, Qiuhong</au><au>Liu, Yaling</au><au>Ren, Ziqi</au><au>Liu, Ying</au><au>Xue, Lianbi</au><aucorp>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), No. 89 Taoyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518052, China</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, A zone, No.199 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation</atitle><jtitle>Diving and hyperbaric medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Diving Hyperb Med</addtitle><date>2024-09-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>212-216</pages><issn>1833-3516</issn><issn>2209-1491</issn><eissn>2209-1491</eissn><abstract>The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated.
The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperbaric chamber. The inspiratory pressure (PI) of the ventilator was set to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 kPa (approximately 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cmH₂O). The compliance and resistance of the test lung were set to 200 mL·kPa⁻¹ and 2 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹, respectively. Experiments were conducted at 101, 203 and 284 kPa ambient pressure (1.0, 2.0 and 2.8 atmospheres absolute respectively). At each of the 5 PI values, the tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and peak inspiratory flow (Fpeak) displayed by the ventilator and the test lung were recorded for 20 cycles. Test lung data were considered the actual ventilation values. The ventilation data were compared among the three groups to evaluate the stability of the ventilator.
At every PI, the Ppeak detected by the ventilator decreased slightly with increasing ambient pressure. The Fpeak values measured by the test lung decreased substantially as the ambient pressure increased. Nevertheless, the reduction in VT at 284 kPa and PI 30 cmH₂O (compared to performance at 101 kPa) was comparatively small (approximately 60 ml).
In PCV mode this ventilator provided relatively stable VT across clinically relevant PI values to ambient pressures as high as 284 kPa. However, because Fpeak decreases at higher ambient pressure, some user adjustment might be necessary for precise VT maintenance during clinical use at higher PIs and ambient pressures.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>39288926</pmid><doi>10.28920/dhm54.3.212-216</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1833-3516 |
ispartof | Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2024-09, Vol.54 (3), p.212-216 |
issn | 1833-3516 2209-1491 2209-1491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106459667 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Atmosphere Exposure Chambers Atmospheric Pressure Equipment Design Humans Hyperbaric Oxygenation - methods Lung Compliance - physiology Maximal Respiratory Pressures Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods Pressure Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation Respiration, Artificial - methods Tidal Volume - physiology Ventilators, Mechanical |
title | Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T10%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20new%20hyperbaric%20oxygen%20ventilator%20during%20pressure-controlled%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=Diving%20and%20hyperbaric%20medicine&rft.au=Wang,%20Cong&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Hyperbaric%20Oxygen,%20Huazhong%20University%20of%20Science%20and%20Technology%20Union%20Shenzhen%20Hospital%20(Nanshan%20Hospital),%20No.%2089%20Taoyuan%20Road,%20Nanshan%20District,%20Shenzhen%20518052,%20China&rft.date=2024-09-30&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=212-216&rft.issn=1833-3516&rft.eissn=2209-1491&rft_id=info:doi/10.28920/dhm54.3.212-216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106459667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106459667&rft_id=info:pmid/39288926&rfr_iscdi=true |