Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation

The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated. The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diving and hyperbaric medicine 2024-09, Vol.54 (3), p.212-216
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Cong, Yu, Qiuhong, Liu, Yaling, Ren, Ziqi, Liu, Ying, Xue, Lianbi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue 3
container_start_page 212
container_title Diving and hyperbaric medicine
container_volume 54
creator Wang, Cong
Yu, Qiuhong
Liu, Yaling
Ren, Ziqi
Liu, Ying
Xue, Lianbi
description The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated. The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperbaric chamber. The inspiratory pressure (PI) of the ventilator was set to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 kPa (approximately 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cmH₂O). The compliance and resistance of the test lung were set to 200 mL·kPa⁻¹ and 2 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹, respectively. Experiments were conducted at 101, 203 and 284 kPa ambient pressure (1.0, 2.0 and 2.8 atmospheres absolute respectively). At each of the 5 PI values, the tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and peak inspiratory flow (Fpeak) displayed by the ventilator and the test lung were recorded for 20 cycles. Test lung data were considered the actual ventilation values. The ventilation data were compared among the three groups to evaluate the stability of the ventilator. At every PI, the Ppeak detected by the ventilator decreased slightly with increasing ambient pressure. The Fpeak values measured by the test lung decreased substantially as the ambient pressure increased. Nevertheless, the reduction in VT at 284 kPa and PI 30 cmH₂O (compared to performance at 101 kPa) was comparatively small (approximately 60 ml). In PCV mode this ventilator provided relatively stable VT across clinically relevant PI values to ambient pressures as high as 284 kPa. However, because Fpeak decreases at higher ambient pressure, some user adjustment might be necessary for precise VT maintenance during clinical use at higher PIs and ambient pressures.
doi_str_mv 10.28920/dhm54.3.212-216
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106459667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3106459667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c182t-7319113b46b8b997d9eca0b2e810205e1ef4d6b420f052b786cc7a60e5921b583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EoqWwM6GMLCl-xI49oqo8pEosIEbLdm7aoCQOdlLovydqS4eru3znDAehW4LnVCqKH4pNw7M5m1NCU0rEGZpSilVKMkXO0ZRIxlLGiZigqxi_MOYZE_wSTZiicuTFFH0ut6YeTF_5NvFlYpIWfpLNroNgTahc4n93a2iTLbR9VZveh6QYQtWuky5AjEOA1Pm2D76uoTitRtk1uihNHeHm-Gfo42n5vnhJV2_Pr4vHVeqIpH2aM6IIYTYTVlql8kKBM9hSkARTzIFAmRXCZhSXmFObS-FcbgQGriixXLIZuj94u-C_B4i9bqrooK5NC36ImhEsMq6EyMcpPkxd8DEGKHUXqsaEnSZY73PqfU7N9JhzPDEid0f7YBsoTsB_P_YHqwVx-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106459667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Cong ; Yu, Qiuhong ; Liu, Yaling ; Ren, Ziqi ; Liu, Ying ; Xue, Lianbi</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cong ; Yu, Qiuhong ; Liu, Yaling ; Ren, Ziqi ; Liu, Ying ; Xue, Lianbi ; Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), No. 89 Taoyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518052, China ; Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, A zone, No.199 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China</creatorcontrib><description>The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated. The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperbaric chamber. The inspiratory pressure (PI) of the ventilator was set to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 kPa (approximately 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cmH₂O). The compliance and resistance of the test lung were set to 200 mL·kPa⁻¹ and 2 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹, respectively. Experiments were conducted at 101, 203 and 284 kPa ambient pressure (1.0, 2.0 and 2.8 atmospheres absolute respectively). At each of the 5 PI values, the tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and peak inspiratory flow (Fpeak) displayed by the ventilator and the test lung were recorded for 20 cycles. Test lung data were considered the actual ventilation values. The ventilation data were compared among the three groups to evaluate the stability of the ventilator. At every PI, the Ppeak detected by the ventilator decreased slightly with increasing ambient pressure. The Fpeak values measured by the test lung decreased substantially as the ambient pressure increased. Nevertheless, the reduction in VT at 284 kPa and PI 30 cmH₂O (compared to performance at 101 kPa) was comparatively small (approximately 60 ml). In PCV mode this ventilator provided relatively stable VT across clinically relevant PI values to ambient pressures as high as 284 kPa. However, because Fpeak decreases at higher ambient pressure, some user adjustment might be necessary for precise VT maintenance during clinical use at higher PIs and ambient pressures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1833-3516</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2209-1491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2209-1491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.28920/dhm54.3.212-216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39288926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Atmosphere Exposure Chambers ; Atmospheric Pressure ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Hyperbaric Oxygenation - methods ; Lung Compliance - physiology ; Maximal Respiratory Pressures ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods ; Pressure ; Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Tidal Volume - physiology ; Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2024-09, Vol.54 (3), p.212-216</ispartof><rights>Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39288926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qiuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yaling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Ziqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Lianbi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), No. 89 Taoyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518052, China</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, A zone, No.199 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation</title><title>Diving and hyperbaric medicine</title><addtitle>Diving Hyperb Med</addtitle><description>The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated. The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperbaric chamber. The inspiratory pressure (PI) of the ventilator was set to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 kPa (approximately 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cmH₂O). The compliance and resistance of the test lung were set to 200 mL·kPa⁻¹ and 2 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹, respectively. Experiments were conducted at 101, 203 and 284 kPa ambient pressure (1.0, 2.0 and 2.8 atmospheres absolute respectively). At each of the 5 PI values, the tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and peak inspiratory flow (Fpeak) displayed by the ventilator and the test lung were recorded for 20 cycles. Test lung data were considered the actual ventilation values. The ventilation data were compared among the three groups to evaluate the stability of the ventilator. At every PI, the Ppeak detected by the ventilator decreased slightly with increasing ambient pressure. The Fpeak values measured by the test lung decreased substantially as the ambient pressure increased. Nevertheless, the reduction in VT at 284 kPa and PI 30 cmH₂O (compared to performance at 101 kPa) was comparatively small (approximately 60 ml). In PCV mode this ventilator provided relatively stable VT across clinically relevant PI values to ambient pressures as high as 284 kPa. However, because Fpeak decreases at higher ambient pressure, some user adjustment might be necessary for precise VT maintenance during clinical use at higher PIs and ambient pressures.</description><subject>Atmosphere Exposure Chambers</subject><subject>Atmospheric Pressure</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperbaric Oxygenation - methods</subject><subject>Lung Compliance - physiology</subject><subject>Maximal Respiratory Pressures</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Tidal Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><issn>1833-3516</issn><issn>2209-1491</issn><issn>2209-1491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EoqWwM6GMLCl-xI49oqo8pEosIEbLdm7aoCQOdlLovydqS4eru3znDAehW4LnVCqKH4pNw7M5m1NCU0rEGZpSilVKMkXO0ZRIxlLGiZigqxi_MOYZE_wSTZiicuTFFH0ut6YeTF_5NvFlYpIWfpLNroNgTahc4n93a2iTLbR9VZveh6QYQtWuky5AjEOA1Pm2D76uoTitRtk1uihNHeHm-Gfo42n5vnhJV2_Pr4vHVeqIpH2aM6IIYTYTVlql8kKBM9hSkARTzIFAmRXCZhSXmFObS-FcbgQGriixXLIZuj94u-C_B4i9bqrooK5NC36ImhEsMq6EyMcpPkxd8DEGKHUXqsaEnSZY73PqfU7N9JhzPDEid0f7YBsoTsB_P_YHqwVx-w</recordid><startdate>20240930</startdate><enddate>20240930</enddate><creator>Wang, Cong</creator><creator>Yu, Qiuhong</creator><creator>Liu, Yaling</creator><creator>Ren, Ziqi</creator><creator>Liu, Ying</creator><creator>Xue, Lianbi</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240930</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation</title><author>Wang, Cong ; Yu, Qiuhong ; Liu, Yaling ; Ren, Ziqi ; Liu, Ying ; Xue, Lianbi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c182t-7319113b46b8b997d9eca0b2e810205e1ef4d6b420f052b786cc7a60e5921b583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere Exposure Chambers</topic><topic>Atmospheric Pressure</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperbaric Oxygenation - methods</topic><topic>Lung Compliance - physiology</topic><topic>Maximal Respiratory Pressures</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Tidal Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Ventilators, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qiuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yaling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Ziqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Lianbi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), No. 89 Taoyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518052, China</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, A zone, No.199 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diving and hyperbaric medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Cong</au><au>Yu, Qiuhong</au><au>Liu, Yaling</au><au>Ren, Ziqi</au><au>Liu, Ying</au><au>Xue, Lianbi</au><aucorp>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), No. 89 Taoyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518052, China</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, A zone, No.199 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation</atitle><jtitle>Diving and hyperbaric medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Diving Hyperb Med</addtitle><date>2024-09-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>212-216</pages><issn>1833-3516</issn><issn>2209-1491</issn><eissn>2209-1491</eissn><abstract>The stability of a new hyperbaric ventilator (Shangrila590, Beijing Aeonmed Company, Beijing, China) at different clinically relevant pressures in a hyperbaric chamber during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) was investigated. The ventilator was connected to a test lung in the multiplace hyperbaric chamber. The inspiratory pressure (PI) of the ventilator was set to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 kPa (approximately 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cmH₂O). The compliance and resistance of the test lung were set to 200 mL·kPa⁻¹ and 2 kPa·L⁻¹·s⁻¹, respectively. Experiments were conducted at 101, 203 and 284 kPa ambient pressure (1.0, 2.0 and 2.8 atmospheres absolute respectively). At each of the 5 PI values, the tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) and peak inspiratory flow (Fpeak) displayed by the ventilator and the test lung were recorded for 20 cycles. Test lung data were considered the actual ventilation values. The ventilation data were compared among the three groups to evaluate the stability of the ventilator. At every PI, the Ppeak detected by the ventilator decreased slightly with increasing ambient pressure. The Fpeak values measured by the test lung decreased substantially as the ambient pressure increased. Nevertheless, the reduction in VT at 284 kPa and PI 30 cmH₂O (compared to performance at 101 kPa) was comparatively small (approximately 60 ml). In PCV mode this ventilator provided relatively stable VT across clinically relevant PI values to ambient pressures as high as 284 kPa. However, because Fpeak decreases at higher ambient pressure, some user adjustment might be necessary for precise VT maintenance during clinical use at higher PIs and ambient pressures.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>39288926</pmid><doi>10.28920/dhm54.3.212-216</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1833-3516
ispartof Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2024-09, Vol.54 (3), p.212-216
issn 1833-3516
2209-1491
2209-1491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106459667
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Atmosphere Exposure Chambers
Atmospheric Pressure
Equipment Design
Humans
Hyperbaric Oxygenation - methods
Lung Compliance - physiology
Maximal Respiratory Pressures
Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation
Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods
Pressure
Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Tidal Volume - physiology
Ventilators, Mechanical
title Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T10%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20new%20hyperbaric%20oxygen%20ventilator%20during%20pressure-controlled%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=Diving%20and%20hyperbaric%20medicine&rft.au=Wang,%20Cong&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Hyperbaric%20Oxygen,%20Huazhong%20University%20of%20Science%20and%20Technology%20Union%20Shenzhen%20Hospital%20(Nanshan%20Hospital),%20No.%2089%20Taoyuan%20Road,%20Nanshan%20District,%20Shenzhen%20518052,%20China&rft.date=2024-09-30&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=212-216&rft.issn=1833-3516&rft.eissn=2209-1491&rft_id=info:doi/10.28920/dhm54.3.212-216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106459667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106459667&rft_id=info:pmid/39288926&rfr_iscdi=true