Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in inexperienced centers: a multicenter study in southwest Japan

EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has shown promising procedural outcomes in high-volume centers. Although inferior procedural outcomes were reported in inexperienced centers during the early days of EUS-BD, the current outcomes are unknown. This study aimed to clarify the feasibility and safety...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2024-09
Hauptverfasser: Koga, Takehiko, Ishida, Yusuke, Hashigo, Shunpei, Shimokawa, Yuzo, Harima, Hirofumi, Okamoto, Kazuhisa, Ohno, Akihisa, Miyagahara, Tsukasa, Fujita, Toshihiro, Fukuchi, Satoshi, Takahashi, Kosuke, Taguchi, Hiroki, Araki, Norimasa, Ohtsuka, Yuichiro, Uekitani, Toshiyuki, Tsuneyoshi, Kengo, Akiyama, Takumi, Ishigaki, Noriko, Maruo, Toru, Saito, Hirokazu, Ihara, Ryo, Yamasuji, Akihiro, Oe, Shinji, Yoshinari, Motohiro, Sagami, Ryota, Fujimori, Nao, Fukuda, Yoshio, Ozawa, Eisuke, Jikuya, Kenichi, Shinohara, Hiroki, Sen-yo, Manabu, Ueki, Toshiharu, Tsuchiya, Naoaki, Kitaguchi, Takanori, Matsumoto, Keisuke, Fukuyama, Makoto, Hirai, Fumihito
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has shown promising procedural outcomes in high-volume centers. Although inferior procedural outcomes were reported in inexperienced centers during the early days of EUS-BD, the current outcomes are unknown. This study aimed to clarify the feasibility and safety of EUS-BD in centers that recently introduced EUS-BD. This multicenter retrospective study was conducted at 22 centers that introduced EUS-BD between 2017 and 2022. A maximum of 20 initial EUS-BD cases at each center were evaluated. The clinical outcomes and experience of 84 endoscopists who performed these procedures were examined. Primary outcomes were the rate of technical success and adverse events (AEs), whereas secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with technical failure and procedure-related AEs. Two hundred fifty-five patients were enrolled. The technical success rate was 91.4% (233/255). Among 22 technical failure cases, guidewire manipulation failure was the most common cause (n = 12) followed by tract dilation failure (n = 5). The AE rate was 10.2% (26/255). Multivariate analysis identified a puncture target diameter of 
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.09.014