Histopathological response to chemotherapy and survival of mucinous type gastric cancer

Data on the clinicopathological characteristics of mucinous gastric cancer (muc-GC) are limited. This study compares the clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy between patients with resectable muc-GC, intestinal (int-GC) and diffuse (dif-GC) gastric cancer. Patients from the D1/D2 study or th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2024-09
Hauptverfasser: Caspers, Irene A, Slagter, Astrid E, Vissers, Pauline A J, Lopez-Yurda, Martha, Beerepoot, Laurens V, Ruurda, Jelle P, Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A P, Gisbertz, Suzanne S, Van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I, Hartgrink, Henk H, Goudkade, Danny, Kodach, Liudmila L, Van Sandick, Johanna W, Verheij, Marcel, Verhoeven, Rob H A, Cats, Annemieke, Van Grieken, Nicole C T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Data on the clinicopathological characteristics of mucinous gastric cancer (muc-GC) are limited. This study compares the clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy between patients with resectable muc-GC, intestinal (int-GC) and diffuse (dif-GC) gastric cancer. Patients from the D1/D2 study or the CRITICS trial were included in exploratory surgery-alone (SAtest) or chemotherapy test (CTtest) cohorts. Real-world data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry on patients treated between with surgery-alone (SAvalidation), and receiving preoperative chemotherapy with or without postoperative treatment (CTvalidation) were used for validation. Histopathological subtypes were extracted from pathology reports filed in the Dutch Pathology Registry and correlated with tumor regression grade (TRG) and relative survival (RS). In SAtest (n = 549) and SAvalidation (n = 8062) cohorts, muc-GC patients had a five-year RS of 39% and 31%, similar to or slightly better than dif-GC (43% and 29%, p = .52 and p = .011), but worse than int-GC (55% and 42%, p = .11 and p 
ISSN:0027-8874
1460-2105
1460-2105
DOI:10.1093/jnci/djae227