Does the response of Rubisco and photosynthesis to elevated CO2 change with unfavourable environmental conditions?

Climate change due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions affects plant performance globally. To improve crop resilience, we need to understand the effects of elevated CO2 concentration (e[CO2]) on CO2 assimilation and Rubisco biochemistry. However, the interactive effects of e[CO2] and abiotic stress are especially unclear. This study analyses the CO2 effect on photosynthetic capacity under different water availability and temperature conditions in 42 different crop species, varying in functional group, photosynthetic pathway and phenological stage. We analysed close to 3000 data points extracted from 120 published manuscripts. For C3 species, e[CO2] increases net photosynthesis and intercellular [CO2], while reducing stomatal conductance and transpiration. Vmaxc, Rubisco in vitro extractable maximal activity and content also decrease with e[CO2] in C3 species, while C4 crops are less responsive to e[CO2]. The interaction with drought and/or heat stress does not significantly alter these photosynthetic responses, indicating that the photosynthetic capacity of stressed plants responds to e[CO2]. Moreover, e[CO2] has strong effect on the photosynthetic capacity of grasses mainly in the final stages of development. This study provides insight into the intricate interactions within the plant photosynthetic apparatus under the influence of climate change, enhancing the understanding of mechanisms governing plant responses to environmental parameters.Climate change due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions affects plant performance globally. To improve crop resilience, we need to understand the effects of elevated CO2 concentration (e[CO2]) on CO2 assimilation and Rubisco biochemistry. However, the interactive effects of e[CO2] and abiotic stress are especially unclear. This study analyses the CO2 effect on photosynthetic capacity under different water availability and temperature conditions in 42 different crop species, varying in functional group, photosynthetic pathway and phenological stage. We analysed close to 3000 data points extracted from 120 published manuscripts. For C3 species, e[CO2] increases net photosynthesis and intercellular [CO2], while reducing stomatal conductance and transpiration. Vmaxc, Rubisco in vitro extractable maximal activity and content also decrease with e[CO2] in C3 species, while C4 crops are less responsive to e[CO2]. The interaction with drought and/or heat stress does not significantly alter these photosynthetic responses, indicating that