Lesion delivery and scar formation in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The DECAAF II trial

The Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation randomized trial showed no difference in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence with additional delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) fibrosis-targeted ablation to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2024-09
Hauptverfasser: Akoum, Nazem, Mekhael, Mario, Bisbal, Felipe, Wazni, Oussama, McGann, Christopher, Lee, Hyejung, Bardsley, Tyler, Greene, Tom, Dean, J. Michael, Dagher, Lilas, Kholmovski, Eugene, Mansour, Moussa, Marchlinski, Francis, Wilber, David, Hindricks, Gerhard, Mahnkopf, Christian, Wells, Darryl, Jaïs, Pierre, Sanders, Prashanthan, Brachmann, Johannes, Bax, Jeroen J., Morrison-de Boer, Leonie, Deneke, Thomas, Calkins, Hugh, Sohns, Christian, Marrouche, Nassir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation randomized trial showed no difference in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence with additional delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) fibrosis-targeted ablation to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in persistent AF. We evaluated the effect of lesion delivery on ablation-induced scarring and AF recurrence. Lesions delivered, targeting fibrotic and nonfibrotic areas identified from preablation DE-MRI, were studied in relation to ablation-induced scarring on 3-month DE-MRI, including their association with arrhythmia recurrence. A total of 593 patients treated with radiofrequency were analyzed: 293 (49.4%) underwent PVI and 300 (50.6%) underwent additional fibrosis-guided ablation. Lesion analysis showed that 80.9% in the MRI fibrosis-guided group vs 16.5% in the PVI group (P < .001) had ≥40% of baseline fibrosis targeted. MRI assessment of ablation-induced scar showed that 44.8% of fibrosis-guided ablation and 15.5% of PVI had ≥40% of their fibrosis covered by scar (P < .001), demonstrating significant attenuation from lesions delivered to scar formed. In the overall population, fibrosis coverage with scar was not associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–1.01; P = .08 per 20% increase). In patients with baseline fibrosis < 20%, fibrosis coverage with scar was associated with lower recurrence than PVI (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–0.97; P = .03), whereas the association was not significant when baseline fibrosis ≥ 20% (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.80–1.17; P = .77). Significant center variation was observed in fibrosis targeting and coverage with scarring. Radiofrequency ablation lesions do not uniformly result in scar formation. A post hoc analysis suggests reduced arrhythmia recurrence when ablation-induced scarring covers fibrotic regions in patients with low baseline fibrosis.
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.08.062