Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study
•Accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in ZI placement was compared.•Robotics system can effectively prevent zygomatic implant overextension.•Robotic system accuracy was slightly lower than dynamic navigation system accuracy.•Robotic systems may require further improvements for zygomati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 2024-11, Vol.150, p.105329, Article 105329 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 105329 |
| container_title | Journal of dentistry |
| container_volume | 150 |
| creator | Guo, Houzuo Jiang, Xi Lin, Ye |
| description | •Accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in ZI placement was compared.•Robotics system can effectively prevent zygomatic implant overextension.•Robotic system accuracy was slightly lower than dynamic navigation system accuracy.•Robotic systems may require further improvements for zygomatic implant placement.
To compare the accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in assisting zygomatic implant (ZI) using an in vitro model experiment.
Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients who underwent ZI treatment between 2011 and 2023 were collected from local databases. Corresponding three-dimensional resin models were printed and assigned to two groups: the robotic and dynamic navigation system groups. Following preoperative plans, ZIs were placed in the models with the assistance of either a robotic or dynamic navigation system. Deviations in the in vitro navigation surgery were measured and compared between the groups.
A total of 110 ZIs were placed in 56 models, with 55 ZIs in each group. No significant differences were observed in entry and angle deviations between the groups (p>0.05). However, the exit deviation in the robotic system group (2.39±1.24 mm) was larger than that in the dynamic navigation group (1.83±1.25 mm) (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105329 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3101796230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571224004986</els_id><sourcerecordid>3101796230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-86982d6cbf8e267ac2748a08571c2716c7af8ee8a7896a9ab7afe4f84c3eace93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAyEUhYnRxFp9Ajcs3UwFZgqMiQvT-Jc0caOJO0KZOw2TDoxAm4xPL3Vcu-HC5Rzu4UPompIFJZTfdouuAZcWjLAqd5Ylq0_QjEpRF1Twz1M0IyUhxVJQdo4uYuwIIRVh9Qy1K98POtjoHfYtDn7jkzU4jjFBj7VrcDM63eeW0we71clmYesD_h63vtdHre2HnXYJ59VAn2Pc4QeHrcMHm4LHMe2b8RKdtXoX4eqvztHH0-P76qVYvz2_rh7WhWGUp0LyWrKGm00rgXGhDROV1ETm4HlLuRE634DUQtZc13qTz1C1sjIl5OF1OUc307tD8F97iEn1NhrY5YDg91GVGZeoOStJlpaT1AQfY4BWDcH2OoyKEnWkqjr1S1UdqaqJanbdTy7IvzhYCCoaC85AYwOYpBpv__X_AOI-g5s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3101796230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Guo, Houzuo ; Jiang, Xi ; Lin, Ye</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Houzuo ; Jiang, Xi ; Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><description>•Accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in ZI placement was compared.•Robotics system can effectively prevent zygomatic implant overextension.•Robotic system accuracy was slightly lower than dynamic navigation system accuracy.•Robotic systems may require further improvements for zygomatic implant placement.
To compare the accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in assisting zygomatic implant (ZI) using an in vitro model experiment.
Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients who underwent ZI treatment between 2011 and 2023 were collected from local databases. Corresponding three-dimensional resin models were printed and assigned to two groups: the robotic and dynamic navigation system groups. Following preoperative plans, ZIs were placed in the models with the assistance of either a robotic or dynamic navigation system. Deviations in the in vitro navigation surgery were measured and compared between the groups.
A total of 110 ZIs were placed in 56 models, with 55 ZIs in each group. No significant differences were observed in entry and angle deviations between the groups (p>0.05). However, the exit deviation in the robotic system group (2.39±1.24 mm) was larger than that in the dynamic navigation group (1.83±1.25 mm) (p<0.05). On the exit side, the Z-axis deviation in the robotic group (left: -0.28±1.43 mm, right: -0.21±1.30 mm) was smaller than that in the dynamic navigation group (left: 0.76±1.11 mm, right: 0.85±1.52 mm) (p<0.05), while no significant differences were found in X- and Y-axis deviations (p>0.05).
Compared with the dynamic navigation system, the robotic system can effectively prevent ZI overextension. However, its accuracy on the exit side is slightly lower than that of the dynamic navigation system.
This preliminary in vitro study showed that the accuracy of the robotic system was slightly inferior to that of the dynamic navigation system in terms of exit deviation when used in ZI placement. Further clinical studies are required to confirm these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Dynamic navigation system ; In vitro study ; Maxillary atrophy rehabilitation ; Robotic system ; Surgical accuracy ; Zygomatic implant</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2024-11, Vol.150, p.105329, Article 105329</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-86982d6cbf8e267ac2748a08571c2716c7af8ee8a7896a9ab7afe4f84c3eace93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7076-5522</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Houzuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><description>•Accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in ZI placement was compared.•Robotics system can effectively prevent zygomatic implant overextension.•Robotic system accuracy was slightly lower than dynamic navigation system accuracy.•Robotic systems may require further improvements for zygomatic implant placement.
To compare the accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in assisting zygomatic implant (ZI) using an in vitro model experiment.
Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients who underwent ZI treatment between 2011 and 2023 were collected from local databases. Corresponding three-dimensional resin models were printed and assigned to two groups: the robotic and dynamic navigation system groups. Following preoperative plans, ZIs were placed in the models with the assistance of either a robotic or dynamic navigation system. Deviations in the in vitro navigation surgery were measured and compared between the groups.
A total of 110 ZIs were placed in 56 models, with 55 ZIs in each group. No significant differences were observed in entry and angle deviations between the groups (p>0.05). However, the exit deviation in the robotic system group (2.39±1.24 mm) was larger than that in the dynamic navigation group (1.83±1.25 mm) (p<0.05). On the exit side, the Z-axis deviation in the robotic group (left: -0.28±1.43 mm, right: -0.21±1.30 mm) was smaller than that in the dynamic navigation group (left: 0.76±1.11 mm, right: 0.85±1.52 mm) (p<0.05), while no significant differences were found in X- and Y-axis deviations (p>0.05).
Compared with the dynamic navigation system, the robotic system can effectively prevent ZI overextension. However, its accuracy on the exit side is slightly lower than that of the dynamic navigation system.
This preliminary in vitro study showed that the accuracy of the robotic system was slightly inferior to that of the dynamic navigation system in terms of exit deviation when used in ZI placement. Further clinical studies are required to confirm these findings.</description><subject>Dynamic navigation system</subject><subject>In vitro study</subject><subject>Maxillary atrophy rehabilitation</subject><subject>Robotic system</subject><subject>Surgical accuracy</subject><subject>Zygomatic implant</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OAyEUhYnRxFp9Ajcs3UwFZgqMiQvT-Jc0caOJO0KZOw2TDoxAm4xPL3Vcu-HC5Rzu4UPompIFJZTfdouuAZcWjLAqd5Ylq0_QjEpRF1Twz1M0IyUhxVJQdo4uYuwIIRVh9Qy1K98POtjoHfYtDn7jkzU4jjFBj7VrcDM63eeW0we71clmYesD_h63vtdHre2HnXYJ59VAn2Pc4QeHrcMHm4LHMe2b8RKdtXoX4eqvztHH0-P76qVYvz2_rh7WhWGUp0LyWrKGm00rgXGhDROV1ETm4HlLuRE634DUQtZc13qTz1C1sjIl5OF1OUc307tD8F97iEn1NhrY5YDg91GVGZeoOStJlpaT1AQfY4BWDcH2OoyKEnWkqjr1S1UdqaqJanbdTy7IvzhYCCoaC85AYwOYpBpv__X_AOI-g5s</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Guo, Houzuo</creator><creator>Jiang, Xi</creator><creator>Lin, Ye</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-5522</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study</title><author>Guo, Houzuo ; Jiang, Xi ; Lin, Ye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-86982d6cbf8e267ac2748a08571c2716c7af8ee8a7896a9ab7afe4f84c3eace93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Dynamic navigation system</topic><topic>In vitro study</topic><topic>Maxillary atrophy rehabilitation</topic><topic>Robotic system</topic><topic>Surgical accuracy</topic><topic>Zygomatic implant</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Houzuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Houzuo</au><au>Jiang, Xi</au><au>Lin, Ye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>150</volume><spage>105329</spage><pages>105329-</pages><artnum>105329</artnum><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>•Accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in ZI placement was compared.•Robotics system can effectively prevent zygomatic implant overextension.•Robotic system accuracy was slightly lower than dynamic navigation system accuracy.•Robotic systems may require further improvements for zygomatic implant placement.
To compare the accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in assisting zygomatic implant (ZI) using an in vitro model experiment.
Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients who underwent ZI treatment between 2011 and 2023 were collected from local databases. Corresponding three-dimensional resin models were printed and assigned to two groups: the robotic and dynamic navigation system groups. Following preoperative plans, ZIs were placed in the models with the assistance of either a robotic or dynamic navigation system. Deviations in the in vitro navigation surgery were measured and compared between the groups.
A total of 110 ZIs were placed in 56 models, with 55 ZIs in each group. No significant differences were observed in entry and angle deviations between the groups (p>0.05). However, the exit deviation in the robotic system group (2.39±1.24 mm) was larger than that in the dynamic navigation group (1.83±1.25 mm) (p<0.05). On the exit side, the Z-axis deviation in the robotic group (left: -0.28±1.43 mm, right: -0.21±1.30 mm) was smaller than that in the dynamic navigation group (left: 0.76±1.11 mm, right: 0.85±1.52 mm) (p<0.05), while no significant differences were found in X- and Y-axis deviations (p>0.05).
Compared with the dynamic navigation system, the robotic system can effectively prevent ZI overextension. However, its accuracy on the exit side is slightly lower than that of the dynamic navigation system.
This preliminary in vitro study showed that the accuracy of the robotic system was slightly inferior to that of the dynamic navigation system in terms of exit deviation when used in ZI placement. Further clinical studies are required to confirm these findings.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105329</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-5522</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0300-5712 |
| ispartof | Journal of dentistry, 2024-11, Vol.150, p.105329, Article 105329 |
| issn | 0300-5712 1879-176X 1879-176X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3101796230 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Dynamic navigation system In vitro study Maxillary atrophy rehabilitation Robotic system Surgical accuracy Zygomatic implant |
| title | Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A53%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20robotic%20system%20and%20dynamic%20navigation%20for%20zygomatic%20implant%20placement:%20An%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Guo,%20Houzuo&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=150&rft.spage=105329&rft.pages=105329-&rft.artnum=105329&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3101796230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3101796230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0300571224004986&rfr_iscdi=true |