Learning curve in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery
Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery poses unique challenges. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the learning curve (LC) in RPS surgery, assessing the relationship between surgical experience and outcomes. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to analyze 62 RPS surgeries performed by a si...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of surgical oncology 2024-11, Vol.50 (11), p.108612, Article 108612 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery poses unique challenges. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the learning curve (LC) in RPS surgery, assessing the relationship between surgical experience and outcomes.
Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to analyze 62 RPS surgeries performed by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2022 at our center.
The number of cases where the surgeon acted as first operator increased from 3 in 2016 to 13 in 2022. The surgeon operated with his mentor in 66.7 % of cases in 2016, whereas in 7.7 % of cases in 2022. LC consisted of 3 phases. Phase 1 (16 cases), with a negative slope, represented shorter operative time (OT) and fewer number of resected organs (RO). Phase 2 (30 cases) was the plateau phase. Phase 3 (16 cases), with a positive slope, indicated longer OT and more RO. Statistically significant differences were observed in terms of size (p = 0.003), presentation (p = 0.048), number of resected organs (p = 0.046), pattern of resection (p = 0.033), OT (p = 0.006), and length of stay (p = 0.026) between the three phases.
This study focused on the critical role of LC in RPS surgery, emphasizing its influence on outcomes. We identified three phases, highlighting the surgeon's evolution. This offers a framework for educating sarcoma surgeons and ensuring exposure to increasing surgical complexity. In discussions on sarcoma referral centers and the correlation between case volume and outcomes, this study underlines the importance of evaluating LC to distinguish surgeons qualified to manage sarcoma cases within a referral center. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0748-7983 1532-2157 1532-2157 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108612 |