Regional citrate anticoagulation versus LMWH anticoagulation for CRRT in liver failure patients without increased bleeding risk

Background: The optimal anticoagulation regimen for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in liver failure (LF) patients without increased bleeding risk remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a monocentric retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the regional citrate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of artificial organs 2024-10, Vol.47 (10), p.756-764
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Siyan, Yu, Yan, Tang, Siwei, Liu, Tong, Wu, Hao, Liu, Yi, Zhao, Lijuan, Lu, Rui, Zhang, Peng, Bai, Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The optimal anticoagulation regimen for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in liver failure (LF) patients without increased bleeding risk remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a monocentric retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) anticoagulation for CRRT in LF without increased bleeding risk. Method: According to the anticoagulation strategy for CRRT, patients were divided into the RCA and LMWH-anticoagulation groups. The evaluated endpoints were patient survival, filter lifespan, bleeding, citrate accumulation, and totCa/ionCa ratio. Result: Totally 167 and 164 filters were used in the RCA and LMWH group, respectively. The median filter lifespan was significantly longer in the RCA group (34 h (IQR = 24–54) versus 24 h (IQR = 18–45.5) [95%CI, 24.5–33]; p 
ISSN:0391-3988
1724-6040
1724-6040
DOI:10.1177/03913988241269492