Integrating Biocatalysts into Metal‐Organic Frameworks: Disentangling the Roles of Affinity, Molecular Weight, and Size
The integration of biocatalysts within metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) is attracting growing interest due to its potential to both enhance biocatalyst stability and sustain biocatalyst activity in organic solvents. However, the factors that facilitate the post‐synthetic infiltration of such large mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology 2024-11, Vol.25 (21), p.e202400625-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The integration of biocatalysts within metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) is attracting growing interest due to its potential to both enhance biocatalyst stability and sustain biocatalyst activity in organic solvents. However, the factors that facilitate the post‐synthetic infiltration of such large molecules into MOF pores remain unclear. This systematic study enabled the identification of the influence of biocatalyst molecular size, molecular weight and affinity on the uptake by an archetypal MOF, NU‐1000. We analyzed a range of six biocatalysts with molecular weights from 1.9 kDa to 44.4 kDa, respectively. By employing a combination of fluorescence tagging and 3D‐STED confocal laser scanning microscopy, we distinguished between biocatalysts that were internalized within the MOF pores and those sterically excluded. The catalytic functions of the biocatalysts hosted within the MOF were investigated and found to show strong variations relative to the solvated case, ranging from a two‐fold increase to a strong decrease.
Integrating biocatalysts within metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) shows huge promise for enhancing stability and sustaining activity in organic solvents. Here we report on investigates how biocatalyst size, weight, and affinity affect their incorporation into MOF pores, using NU‐1000 as a model. Techniques like fluorescence tagging and 3D‐STED microscopy helped identify which biocatalysts were internalized or excluded, revealing significant variations in their catalytic functions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1439-4227 1439-7633 1439-7633 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cbic.202400625 |