Assessing robotic-assisted surgery versus open approach in penetrating Crohn’s disease: advantages and outcomes in ileocolic resection
Introduction Penetrating Crohn’s disease (CD) often necessitates surgical intervention, with the open approach traditionally favored. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential benefits but remains understudied in this complex patient population. Additionally, the lack of standardized surgical comple...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Techniques in coloproctology 2024-08, Vol.28 (1), p.112 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Penetrating Crohn’s disease (CD) often necessitates surgical intervention, with the open approach traditionally favored. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential benefits but remains understudied in this complex patient population. Additionally, the lack of standardized surgical complexity scoring in CD hinders research and comparisons.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with penetrating CD who underwent either robotic-assisted ileocolic resection (RICR) or open ileocolic resection (OICR) at our institution from January 2007 to December 2021. We assessed endpoints, including length of stay, complications, readmissions, reoperations, and other perioperative outcomes.
Results
RICR demonstrated safety outcomes comparable to OICR. Importantly, RICR patients experienced significantly reduced estimated blood loss (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1123-6337 1128-045X 1128-045X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10151-024-02985-5 |