Comparison of physical activity and quality of life between obese individuals with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and individuals with obesity hypoventilation syndrome
Purpose Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) share common causal factors and comorbidities but may have a variable effect on physical activity and associated quality of life, due to differences in pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to compare the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sleep & breathing 2024-12, Vol.28 (6), p.2683-2691 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) share common causal factors and comorbidities but may have a variable effect on physical activity and associated quality of life, due to differences in pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to compare the levels of physical activity, mental health and quality of life between matched obese patients with either OSAS or OHS, aiming to identify which of the two syndromes may impose the most severe impact on these variables, for the first time in literature.
Methods
A total of 76 obese patients (OSAS: Ν1 = 48, OHS: N2 = 26) of similar age (58.2 ± 12.2 vs. 63.6 ± 9.8;
p
> 0.05), BMI (37.2 ± 6.2 vs. 40.3 ± 7.3;
p
> 0.05), and Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) under non-invasive ventilation, completed International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Short-Form Health Questionnaire (SF-36), Personal Well-Being (PWB) Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D), in this cross-sectional study.
Results
Both groups had similar scores in SF-36, HADS-A and HADS-D, while prevalence of clinical cases of anxiety (HADS-A > 8) and depression (HADS-D > 8) were also similar. OSAS patients scored significantly higher in physical activity [absolute IPAQ values 1100.75(7753.5) for OSAS vs. 518(3806) for OHS;
p
= 0.029]. Group comparisons yielded significant differences in physical functioning (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1520-9512 1522-1709 1522-1709 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11325-024-03148-4 |