Standard Deviation of Individual Response for VO2max Following Exercise Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background Although numerous attempts to demonstrate inter-individual differences in trainability across various outcomes have been unsuccessful, the investigation of maximal oxygen consumption ( V O 2max ) trainability warrants further study. Objective Our objective was to conduct the first systema...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sports medicine (Auckland) 2024-12, Vol.54 (12), p.3069-3080
Hauptverfasser: Renwick, John R. M., Preobrazenski, Nicholas, Wu, Zeyu, Khansari, Ava, LeBouedec, Matisse A., Nuttall, Jared M. G., Bancroft, Kyra R., Simpson-Stairs, Nia, Swinton, Paul A., Gurd, Brendon J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although numerous attempts to demonstrate inter-individual differences in trainability across various outcomes have been unsuccessful, the investigation of maximal oxygen consumption ( V O 2max ) trainability warrants further study. Objective Our objective was to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate inter-individual differences in V O 2max trainability across aerobic exercise training protocols utilizing non-exercising comparator groups. Methods We conducted a literature search across three databases: EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS. The search strategy incorporated two main concepts: aerobic exercise training and V O 2max . Studies were included if they used human participants, employed standardized and supervised exercise training, reported absolute or relative V O 2max , included a non-exercise comparator group, reported V O 2max change scores for non-exercise and exercise groups and provided the standard deviation (SD) of change for all groups. We calculated the SD of individual response (SD IR ) to estimate the presence of inter-individual differences in trainability across all studies. Results The literature search generated 32,968 studies, 24 of which were included in the final analysis. Our findings indicated that (1) the majority of variation in observed change scores following an intervention is due to measurement error, (2) calculating SD IR within a single study would not yield sufficient accuracy of SD IR due to generally small sample sizes and (3) meta-analysis of SD IR 2 across studies does not provide strong evidence for a positive value. Conclusion Overall, our meta-analysis demonstrated that there is not strong evidence supporting the existence of V O 2max trainability across single interventions. As such, it appears unlikely that clinically relevant predictors of V O 2max response will be discovered. Registration can be found online ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9VU3 ).
ISSN:0112-1642
1179-2035
1179-2035
DOI:10.1007/s40279-024-02089-y