Resources on lymphedema surgery: How effective are they for patients?
Online patient education materials (PEMs) on lymphedema surgery were assessed for quality, readability, and content. A total of 37 PEMs were identified, primarily authored by academic/medical organizations. Readability scores indicated materials were difficult to read, with an average Flesch‐Kincaid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2024-09, Vol.130 (3), p.360-365 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Online patient education materials (PEMs) on lymphedema surgery were assessed for quality, readability, and content. A total of 37 PEMs were identified, primarily authored by academic/medical organizations. Readability scores indicated materials were difficult to read, with an average Flesch‐Kincaid Grade Level of 10.4. PEM Assessment Tools showed acceptable understandability (72.3%) but poor actionability (28.5%). PEMs often lacked information on surgical risks, postoperative care, and long‐term follow‐up. Simplifying language and adding visual aids could improve PEM effectiveness. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.27783 |