Computational biomechanical study on hybrid implant materials for the femoral component of total knee replacements

Multifunctional materials have been described to meet the diverse requirements of implant materials for femoral components of uncemented total knee replacements. These materials aim to combine the high wear and corrosion resistance of oxide ceramics at the joint surfaces with the osteogenic potentia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2024-10, Vol.158, p.106681, Article 106681
Hauptverfasser: Sass, Jan-Oliver, Kebbach, Maeruan, Lork, Cornelia, Johannsen, Jan, Weinmann, Markus, Stenzel, Melanie, Bader, Rainer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Multifunctional materials have been described to meet the diverse requirements of implant materials for femoral components of uncemented total knee replacements. These materials aim to combine the high wear and corrosion resistance of oxide ceramics at the joint surfaces with the osteogenic potential of titanium alloys at the bone-implant interface. Our objective was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of hybrid material-based femoral components regarding mechanical stress within the implant during cementless implantation and stress shielding (evaluated by strain energy density) of the periprosthetic bone during two-legged squat motion using finite element modeling. The hybrid materials consisted of alumina-toughened zirconia (ATZ) ceramic joined with additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V or Ti–35Nb–6Ta alloys. The titanium component was modeled with or without an open porous surface structure. Monolithic femoral components of ATZ ceramic or Co–28Cr–6Mo alloy were used as reference. The elasticity of the open porous surface structure was determined within experimental compression tests and was significantly higher for Ti–35Nb–6Ta compared to Ti–6Al–4V (5.2 ± 0.2 GPa vs. 8.8 ± 0.8 GPa, p 
ISSN:1751-6161
1878-0180
1878-0180
DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106681