Balanced Fluids Versus Normal Saline for Initial Fluid Resuscitation in Adults With Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Normal saline (NS) has been the choice fluid for volume resuscitation in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) for decades. Large volume resuscitation with NS can lead to hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and is associated with a higher incidence of major adverse kidney events compared to balanced fluids (BF)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmacy practice 2024-08, p.8971900241273278
Hauptverfasser: Carter, Justin W, Whaley, Patrick M, Gutierrez, G Christina, Fowler, Amanda L, Attridge, Rebecca L, Hughes, Darrel W, Hargrove, Kristi L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Normal saline (NS) has been the choice fluid for volume resuscitation in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) for decades. Large volume resuscitation with NS can lead to hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and is associated with a higher incidence of major adverse kidney events compared to balanced fluids (BF). Compare safety and effectiveness of fluid resuscitation with BF vs NS in adult patients with DKA. Single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated patients who received NS or BF for DKA treatment between July 2020 and August 2021. Primary endpoint was time to DKA resolution. Secondary endpoints included time to anion gap ≤12, HCO ≥15 and ≥18 mmol/L, acute kidney injury, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. 110 patients were included (NS 55% (n = 60), BF 45% (n = 50)). Time to DKA resolution was faster in patients who received BF vs NS (13 (10 - 19) hours vs 17 (11 - 25) hours, = 0.02). Treatment with NS was associated with a longer time to resolution of DKA when adjusted for initial bicarbonate and AKI at admission. BF was associated with a shorter time to DKA resolution compared to NS.
ISSN:0897-1900
1531-1937
1531-1937
DOI:10.1177/08971900241273278