From d8 to d1: Iron(0) and Iron(I) Complexes Complete the Series of Eight Fe Oxidation States within the TIMMNMes Ligand Framework

Reduction of the ferrous precursor [(TIMMNMes)­Fe­(Cl)]+ (1) (TIMMNMes = tris-[(3-mesitylimidazol-2-ylidene)methyl]­amine) to the low-valent iron(0) complex [(TIMMNMes)­Fe­(CO)3] (2) is presented, where the tris­(N-heterocyclic carbene) (NHC) ligand framework remains intact, yet the coordination mode changed from 3-fold to 2-fold coordination of the carbene arms. Further, the corresponding iron­(I) complexes [(TIMMNMes)­Fe­(L)]+ (L = free site, η1-N2, CO, py) (3) are synthesized and fully characterized. Complexes 1–3 demonstrate the notable steric and electronic flexibility of the TIMMNMes ligand framework by variation of the Fe–N anchor and Fe–carbene distances and the variable size of the axial cavity occupation. This is further underpinned by the oxidation of 3-N 2 in a reaction with benzophenone to yield the corresponding, charge-separated iron­(II) radical complex [(TIMMNMes)­Fe­(OCPh2)]+ (4). We found rather surprising similarities in the reactivity behavior when going to low- or high-valent oxidation states of the central iron ion. This is demonstrated by the closely related reactivity of 3-N 2 , where H atom abstraction with TEMPO triggers the formation of the metallacycle [(TIMMNMes*)­Fe­(py)]+ (5), and the reactivity of the highly unstable Fe­(VII) nitride complex [(TIMMNMes)­Fe­(N)­(F)]3+ to give the metallacyclic Fe­(V) imido complex [(TIMMNMesN)­Fe­(NMes)­(MeCN)]3+ (6) upon warming. Thus, the employed tris­(carbene) chelate is not only capable of stabilizing the superoxidized Fe­(VI) and Fe­(VII) nitrides but equally supports the iron center in its low oxidation states 0 and +1. Isolation and characterization of these zero- and monovalent iron complexes demonstrate the extraordinary capability of the tris­(carbene) chelate TIMMN to support iron in eight different oxidation states within the very same ligand platform.