Assessing the utility of the PC‐PTSD‐5 as a screening tool among a cancer survivor sample

Introduction Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is an intensive and invasive procedure used in cancer treatment that can lead to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. These symptoms are frequently overlooked in oncology and general health care settings. The suitability and utilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2024-12, Vol.130 (23), p.4118-4126
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Sophia K., Manschot, Cole, Kuhn, Eric, Laber, Eric, Somers, Tamara J., Syrjala, Karen L., Applebaum, Allison J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is an intensive and invasive procedure used in cancer treatment that can lead to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. These symptoms are frequently overlooked in oncology and general health care settings. The suitability and utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM‐5 (PC‐PTSD‐5) within the cancer population remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate its performance as a brief (five‐item) case‐finding screening alternative to the longer (20‐item) PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5) in survivors who received an HCT 1 to 5 years ago. Methods A total of 817 cancer survivors completed the PC‐PTSD‐5 and PCL‐5 during recruitment for a randomized clinical trial. Optimal cut scores for identifying probable PTSD and item performance were determined using indices correcting for chance and item response theory analyses. Results Of the HCT sample, 10.4% screened as positive for probable DSM‐5 PTSD using the PCL‐5. The PC‐PTSD‐5 exhibited strong internal consistency and significant associations with PCL‐5 scores (total, r = .82; items, rs = .56–.61). A cutoff score of 2 provided optimal sensitivity for screening (κ[Se] = .95), whereas a cut score of 4 demonstrated the highest efficiency for detecting a probable DSM‐5 PTSD diagnosis on the PCL‐5 (κ[Eff] = .39). Item response theory analyses indicated that item 4 (numbing) of the PC‐PTSD‐5 yielded the most informative data, with other items potentially lacking incremental utility. Conclusion Although not an instrument validation study, these findings offer efficient evidence for using the PC‐PTSD‐5 as a succinct screening tool among cancer survivors in a clinical context. Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04058795, registered 8/16/2019 This study demonstrates the value of specialized brief screening tools such as the PC‐PTSD‐5 in the oncology setting. By effectively identifying and addressing posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, health care professionals can enhance care and improve the psychological health of individuals navigating the challenging terrain of cancer.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.35504