In-beam PET treatment monitoring of carbon therapy patients: Results of a clinical trial at CNAO

Carbon ion therapy treatments can be monitored non-invasively with in-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET). At CNAO the INSIDE in-beam PET scanner has been used in a clinical trial (NCT03662373) to monitor cancer treatments with proton and carbon therapy. In this work we present the analysis resu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physica medica 2024-09, Vol.125, p.104493, Article 104493
Hauptverfasser: Kraan, Aafke Christine, Susini, Filippo, Moglioni, Martina, Battistoni, Giuseppe, Bersani, Davide, Carra, Pietro, Cerello, Piergiorgio, De Gregorio, Angelica, Ferrero, Veronica, Fiorina, Elisa, Franciosini, Gaia, Morrocchi, Matteo, Muraro, Silvia, Patera, Vincenzo, Pennazio, Francesco, Retico, Alessandra, Rosso, Valeria, Sarti, Alessio, Schiavi, Angelo, Sportelli, Giancarlo, Traini, Giacomo, Vischioni, Barbara, Vitolo, Viviana, Bisogni, Maria Giuseppina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Carbon ion therapy treatments can be monitored non-invasively with in-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET). At CNAO the INSIDE in-beam PET scanner has been used in a clinical trial (NCT03662373) to monitor cancer treatments with proton and carbon therapy. In this work we present the analysis results of carbon therapy data, acquired during the first phase of the clinical trial, analyzing data of nine patients treated at CNAO for various malignant tumors in the head-and-neck region. The patient group contained two patients requiring replanning, and seven patients without replanning, based on established protocols. For each patient the PET images acquired along the course of treatment were compared with a reference, applying two analysis methods: the beam-eye-view (BEV) method and the γ-index analysis. Time trends in several parameters were investigated, as well as the agreement with control CTs, if available. Regarding the BEV-method, the average sigma value σ was 3.7 mm of range difference distributions for patients without changes (sensitivity of the INSIDE detector). The 3D-information obtained from the BEV analysis was partly in agreement with what was observed in the control CT. The data quality and quantity was insufficient for a definite interpretation of the time trends. We analyzed carbon therapy data acquired with the INSIDE in-beam PET detector using two analysis methods. The data allowed to evaluate sensitivity of the INSIDE detector for carbon therapy and to make several recommendations for the future. •Nine carbon therapy patients were monitored with in-beam PET (NCT03662373).•Two analysis methods were applied: gamma-index and Beam-Eye-View analysis.•The sensitivity of the INSIDE detector was evaluated for carbon therapy.•More data is needed to verify time trends in the analysis parameters and to relate them to anatomical changes.•The reliability of the 3D information should be studied in the future.
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104493