Anaesthetic practices and attitudes to patient safety in a sample of Australian veterinary practices

To survey anaesthetic practices and attitudes towards veterinary patient safety in Australia. This was a cross-sectional sample population from Australian veterinary practices, including first opinion small animal, mixed animal and referral small animal practices. The survey included practices’ anaesthetic management, monitoring equipment and topics regarding patient safety. Responses were obtained from 310/1700 (18%) veterinary practices, with 208 respondents from small animal practices (67%), 71 mixed animal practices (23%) and 31 referral small animal centres (10%). Overall, 61% of respondents reported always having a dedicated staff member monitoring the anaesthetic, who was most commonly a certified veterinary nurse (89%). In 22% of the practices, some of the staff monitoring an anaesthetic did not have any qualification. Completion of anaesthetic plans for each animal prior to an anaesthetic was reported by 24.5% of respondents and labelling of syringes was completed in 80% of practices. Pulse oximetry (98%) and temperature (88%) were the most common clinical variables monitored. The use of capnography (46%) or an electrocardiogram (48%) was also reported by the respondents. Emergency drugs, airway and ventilation equipment are available in 96%, 88% and 59% of practices, respectively. A defibrillator was available in 11% of practices with only 54% respondents being confident in using it. Of the respondents 60% were aware of anaesthesia safety interventions and clinical guidelines regarding patient safety during anaesthesia. Despite practices showing a relative improvement over the years in the standard of anaesthesia care, most of them are still not meeting international guidelines. Areas where changes could lead to improved safety practices could include: a trained person dedicated to monitor anaesthesia, pain scoring evaluation in patients recovering from anaesthesia, an increased use of standardised handover checklists, record keeping and an increase in open discussion of adverse events by the veterinary team.