QRS detection in single-lead, telehealth electrocardiogram signals: Benchmarking open-source algorithms

A key step in electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis is the detection of QRS complexes, particularly for arrhythmia detection. Telehealth ECGs present a new challenge for automated analysis as they are noisier than traditional clinical ECGs. The aim of this study was to identify the best-performing open-s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLOS digital health 2024-08, Vol.3 (8), p.e0000538
Hauptverfasser: Kristof, Florian, Kapsecker, Maximilian, Nissen, Leon, Brimicombe, James, Cowie, Martin R, Ding, Zixuan, Dymond, Andrew, Jonas, Stephan M, Lindén, Hannah Clair, Lip, Gregory Y H, Williams, Kate, Mant, Jonathan, Charlton, Peter H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A key step in electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis is the detection of QRS complexes, particularly for arrhythmia detection. Telehealth ECGs present a new challenge for automated analysis as they are noisier than traditional clinical ECGs. The aim of this study was to identify the best-performing open-source QRS detector for use with telehealth ECGs. The performance of 18 open-source QRS detectors was assessed on six datasets. These included four datasets of ECGs collected under supervision, and two datasets of telehealth ECGs collected without clinical supervision. The telehealth ECGs, consisting of single-lead ECGs recorded between the hands, included a novel dataset of 479 ECGs collected in the SAFER study of screening for atrial fibrillation (AF). Performance was assessed against manual annotations. A total of 12 QRS detectors performed well on ECGs collected under clinical supervision (F1 score ≥0.96). However, fewer performed well on telehealth ECGs: five performed well on the TELE ECG Database; six performed well on high-quality SAFER data; and performance was poorer on low-quality SAFER data (three QRS detectors achieved F1 of 0.78-0.84). The presence of AF had little impact on performance. The Neurokit and University of New South Wales QRS detectors performed best in this study. These performed sufficiently well on high-quality telehealth ECGs, but not on low-quality ECGs. This demonstrates the need to handle low-quality ECGs appropriately to ensure only ECGs which can be accurately analysed are used for clinical decision making.
ISSN:2767-3170
2767-3170
DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000538