Stimulating implementation of clinical practice guidelines in hospital care from a central guideline organization perspective: A systematic review

•We reviewed guideline organizations’ implementation practices for uptake of hospital care guidelines.•Studies reported 62 implementation strategies, that were used in different combinations.•85 % of the initiatives that evaluated implementation impact reported improved outcomes.•Using multiple and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health policy (Amsterdam) 2024-10, Vol.148, p.105135, Article 105135
Hauptverfasser: Thoonsen, Andrea C., van Schoten, Steffie M., Merten, Hanneke, van Beusekom, Ilse, Schoonmade, Linda J., Delnoij, Diana M.J., de Bruijne, Martine C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We reviewed guideline organizations’ implementation practices for uptake of hospital care guidelines.•Studies reported 62 implementation strategies, that were used in different combinations.•85 % of the initiatives that evaluated implementation impact reported improved outcomes.•Using multiple and active implementation strategies seems associated with positive impact.•We expanded the Mazza taxonomy and CFIR with new constructs. The uptake of guidelines in care is inconsistent. This review focuses on guideline implementation strategies used by guideline organizations (governmental agencies, scientific/professional societies and other umbrella organizations), experienced implementation barriers and facilitators and impact of their implementation efforts. We searched PUBMED, EMBASE and CINAHL and conducted snowballing. Eligibility criteria included guidelines focused on hospital care and OECD countries. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We used framework analysis, narrative synthesis and summary statistics. Twenty-six articles were included. Sixty-two implementation strategies were reported, used in different combinations and ranged between 1 and 16 strategies per initiative. Most frequently reported strategies were educational session(s) and implementation supporting materials. The most commonly reported barrier and facilitator were respectively insufficient healthcare professionals’ time and resources; and guideline's credibility, evidence base and relevance. Eighty-five percent of initiatives that measured impact achieved improvements in adoption, knowledge, behavior and/or clinical outcomes. No clear optimal approach for improving guideline uptake and impact was found. However, we found indications that employing multiple active implementation strategies and involving external organizations and hospital staff were associated with improvements. Guideline organizations employ diverse implementation strategies and encounter multiple barriers and facilitators. Our study uncovered potential effective implementation practices. However, further research is needed on effective tailoring of implementation approaches to increase uptake and impact of guidelines.
ISSN:0168-8510
1872-6054
1872-6054
DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105135