Transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetoencephalography are feasible alternatives to invasive methods in optimizing responsive neurostimulation device placement

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy when surgical resection is not possible due to overlap of the irritative zone and eloquent cortex. Presurgical evaluations for RNS placement typically rely on invasive methods. This study investigated the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsy research 2024-10, Vol.206, p.107426, Article 107426
Hauptverfasser: Varner, J. Austin, Rezaie, Roozbeh, Noorizadeh, Negar, Boop, Frederick A., Fulton, Stephen P., Klimo, Paul, Shimony, Nir, Wheless, James W., Narayana, Shalini
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy when surgical resection is not possible due to overlap of the irritative zone and eloquent cortex. Presurgical evaluations for RNS placement typically rely on invasive methods. This study investigated the potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to provide key presurgical information non-invasively. We hypothesized that these non-invasive methods may assist in optimizing RNS placement by providing useful information for seizure localization by MEG and eloquent cortex mapping by TMS. A retrospective chart review identified nine patients who underwent RNS placement (mean age = 20.4 years [SD = 5.6], two-thirds were female). Characterization of the irritative zone using MEG was successful in eight of nine patients. Non-invasive mapping of relevant eloquent cortex was attempted in all patients. TMS was successful in eight of nine patients, and MEG was successful in two of six patients. Importantly, patients mapped with non-invasive modalities experienced an average seizure reduction of 77 % at their most recent clinic visit, compared to 75 % seizure reduction in those with invasive evaluations, indicating appropriate RNS placement. These data demonstrate that TMS and MEG can provide key information for RNS and may be feasible alternatives to invasive methods for assisting in decision making regarding RNS placement. Non-invasive methods for determining RNS placement have a high rate of success when data from multiple non-invasive modalities converge and can inform more accurate placement of intracranial electrodes prior to RNS placement or mitigate their need. •Non-invasive characterization of the irritative zone using magnetoencephalography (MEG) is possible.•Non-invasive mapping of eloquent cortex is possible using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).•TMS and MEG can provide key information for responsive neurostimulator (RNS) placement.
ISSN:0920-1211
1872-6844
1872-6844
DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107426