Local anesthesia vs. general anesthesia in cochlear implant surgery: Impact on surgical duration, postoperative recovery, costs and clinical insights. An extensive meta-analysis
recent studies have shown that around 30 % of men and 20 % of women at the age of 70 have a hearing loss, rates that rise to 55 % and 45 % respectively at the age of 80. Treatment options include hearing aids and cochlear implants. Cochlear implant surgery under local anesthesia (L.A.) is gaining po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of otolaryngology 2024-11, Vol.45 (6), p.104462, Article 104462 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | recent studies have shown that around 30 % of men and 20 % of women at the age of 70 have a hearing loss, rates that rise to 55 % and 45 % respectively at the age of 80. Treatment options include hearing aids and cochlear implants. Cochlear implant surgery under local anesthesia (L.A.) is gaining popularity for its potential benefits. We analyzed the current literature comparing L.A. and general anesthesia (G.A.) surgery by assessing operation duration, post-operative observation time and length of hospital stay.
The study was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The search was performed on different database for articles published from 1984 to 2023. Comparative studies between cochlear implants in L.A. and G.A. with information on duration of surgery, length of hospital stay and time in postoperative care unit (PACU) were included.
Of 65 articles identified, 5 studies were included, involving 634 patients. The studies showed that L.A. surgery had a shorter surgical time than G.A. (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-0709 1532-818X 1532-818X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104462 |