Reflecting on the Spectrum of Involvement: How do we involve patients as partners in education?

Background The Spectrum of Involvement describes six levels of active patient involvement in healthcare education. Only at the highest levels are patients described as ‘equal partners’. Although this framework was never intended to be hierarchical, healthcare educators continue to strive towards asp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2025-02, Vol.59 (2), p.198-209
Hauptverfasser: Bennett‐Weston, Amber, Gay, Simon, Anderson, Elizabeth S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The Spectrum of Involvement describes six levels of active patient involvement in healthcare education. Only at the highest levels are patients described as ‘equal partners’. Although this framework was never intended to be hierarchical, healthcare educators continue to strive towards aspirations for involving patients as ‘equal partners’ in education. However, we do not know what these partnerships mean for all stakeholders and how they can be achieved in practice. This study explores key stakeholders' understandings and experiences of patient partnerships in healthcare education. Methods A qualitative case study design was adopted, underpinned by a social constructivist philosophical stance. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with patients (n = 10) and educators (n = 10) from across a Medical School and a Healthcare School. Five focus groups were held with penultimate year students (n = 20) from across the two Schools. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Three themes were generated: (i) equal partnerships are neither feasible nor desirable; (ii) partnership is about being and feeling valued; and (iii) valuing patients as partners. Patients did not always desire the highest levels of involvement, as ‘equal partners’ in education. All stakeholders agreed that partnership need not be synonymous with equality. Instead, they contended that true partnerships were about valuing patients for their contributions at any level of involvement. Remuneration, student feedback, training and providing institutional access were viewed as important methods of valuing patients as partners. Conclusion Patients, educators and students questioned the notion that patient partnerships are only achievable at the highest levels of involvement. Critical application of the Spectrum of Involvement in future research and education is encouraged. This study addresses a gap in the literature, providing tangible approaches to valuing patients as partners that are endorsed by all stakeholders. We propose a model for achieving valued patient partnerships in educational practice. Reflecting on the Spectrum of Involvement, @a_bennettweston @SimonGayGP and @Liz_Anderso describe how to achieve valued patient partnerships in healthcare education.
ISSN:0308-0110
1365-2923
1365-2923
DOI:10.1111/medu.15484