Genotyping SNPs and Indels: A method to improve the scope and sensitivity of High-Resolution melt (HRM) analysis based applications

•High Resolution Melt (HRM) for SNP genotyping is limited by small Tm shifts due to neutral base changes and instrument accuracy.•mCADMA assay discriminates genotypes via qPCR melt curve analysis using allele-specific primers with added mismatches.•Enables genotyping of challenging SNPs/indels, improves accuracy, speeds up SNP detection and makes it more affordable.•Optimized primer parameters (length, GC, base additions) were established for mCADMA, aiding allele discrimination.•Blake and Delcourt's algorithm (1998) accurately predicts Tm, facilitating optimization of the melt scan temperature range. High-resolution melt (HRM) analysis is a closed-tube technique for detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). However, it has limited use in high-resolution melting devices, even those with high thermal accuracy (HTA). In addition to the cost of switching to these specialized devices, the presence of nearest neighbour neutral changes (class III, IV SNPs and small indels) made HRM-based assays a challenging task due to reduced sensitivity. This study aimed to design a common modified competitive amplification of differently melting amplicons (CADMA)-based assay to address these challenges by generating allele-specific qPCR products that are detectable on most qPCR platforms. For this study, SNPs were selected from all four classes of SNPs (class I: C/T or G/A mutation; class II: C/A or G/T mutation; class III: G/C mutation; class IV: A/T mutation). A single base pair and 19 bp indels were also chosen to simulate how CADMA primers could be designed for indels of varying lengths. The melting temperatures (Tm) were determined using IDT oligoAnalyzer. qPCR and melt data acquisition were performed on the CFX96 qPCR platform, and the melt curve data were analyzed using Precision Melt software (Bio-Rad, USA). The clusters for different genotypes were successfully identified with the aid of the control samples, and Tm predictions were carried out using the uMelt batch and Tm online tools for comparison. Using HRM-qPCR assays based on the modified CADMA method, genotyping of various SNPs was successfully carried out. For some SNPs, similarly shaped melt curves were observed for homozygotes and heterozygotes, making shape-based genotype prediction difficult. The Tm values calculated via the Blake and Delcourts (1998) method were the closest to the experimental Tm values after adjusting for the salt concentration. Since HRM assays usually depend on the ΔTm caused