The use of a tibial stem in primary total knee arthroplasty for patients with a frontal deformity of more than ten degrees reduces the rate of postoperative pain
Background The use of a tibial stem for large deformities (> 10°) would reduce the incidence of pain. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tibial stem on postoperative pain and aseptic loosening at the tibia in patients with a preoperative deformity > 10° in the frontal plane at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2024-08, Vol.34 (6), p.3233-3240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The use of a tibial stem for large deformities (> 10°) would reduce the incidence of pain. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tibial stem on postoperative pain and aseptic loosening at the tibia in patients with a preoperative deformity > 10° in the frontal plane at 2 years follow-up.
Methods
This was a retrospective single-center case–control study. Ninety-eight patients with deformities greater than 10° in the frontal plane and a BMI > 30 kg/m
2
who had undergone posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a tibial stem were matched using a propensity score to 98 patients who had undergone PS TKA without a tibial stem. The primary endpoint was the pain rate at 2 years. The secondary endpoints were the rate of aseptic loosening of the tibia at 2 years post-operatively.
Results
A significant difference was found in the rate of postoperative pain at 2 years. It was higher in the group without tibial stem compared with the group with tibial stem (41.8% vs 17.3%,
p
= 0.0003). In the group without tibial stem, 24.4% of pain was mild, 61% moderate and no severe pain. In the tibial stem group, 47.1% of pain was mild, 41.2% moderate and no severe pain. A radiolucent line (RLL) was present at 2 years in 26.5% of prostheses in the without tibial stem group and in 9.2% of prostheses in the tibial stem group (
p
= 0.002).
There was no difference between the two groups in terms of aseptic loosening.
Conclusion
The use of a tibial stem in primary TKA in patients with frontal deformities greater than 10° reduces postoperative pain and the presence of radiolucent lines. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1432-1068 1633-8065 1432-1068 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00590-024-04052-z |