Adolescent-Preferred financial incentives to promote type 1 diabetes Self-Care: A discrete choice experiment
This study aimed to quantify preferences for the characteristics of a financial incentives program that would motivate adolescent engagement in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care. We performed a discrete choice experiment with 12–18 year-olds with T1D from two pediatric hospital endocrinology clinics (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes research and clinical practice 2024-09, Vol.215, p.111798, Article 111798 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111798 |
container_title | Diabetes research and clinical practice |
container_volume | 215 |
creator | Wright, Davene R. Chen, Tom Chalmers, Kristen D. Shah, Seema K. Yi-Frazier, Joyce P. LeBlanc, Jessica L. Garvey, Katharine Senturia, Kirsten D. Pihoker, Catherine Malik, Faisal S. |
description | This study aimed to quantify preferences for the characteristics of a financial incentives program that would motivate adolescent engagement in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care.
We performed a discrete choice experiment with 12–18 year-olds with T1D from two pediatric hospital endocrinology clinics (n = 317). We identified key attributes of incentives: (1) monthly value of the reward, (2) payment structure, and (3) difficulty of incentivized behaviors. In twelve choice questions, adolescents chose the incentive option from a pair of profiles that was more likely to motivate them to increase adherence to recommended self-care. Options presented were tailored to adolescents’ T1D technology use and perceived difficulty of completing each behavior. We analyzed data using a conditional logit model.
The value of the reward accounted for 60.8% of preferences. Adolescents were willing to accept lower value rewards when incentive payments used positive vs. negative reinforcement (−$10.88 (95% CI: −$12.60, −9.24)) and preferred higher incentives for performing hard vs. easier behaviors (+$14.92 (95% CI: +$12.66, +$17.28)).
Stated preferences can inform intervention design. Future research will evaluate the external validity of the discrete choice experiment-informed intervention design by assessing adolescent health and behavioral outcomes in a randomized controlled trial. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111798 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087698077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168822724007083</els_id><sourcerecordid>3087698077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e8a884b04ad4c4a44146e8a23315734eeb573d734da3073ed0dc88f142fa63af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEgjH4CaAcubQkTdamXNA08SVNAgk4R2niikxdO5JuYv8elw2unGzZr-3XDyEXnKWc8fx6kTpvqgAxzVgmU855UaoDMuKqyBKVZcUhGaFO_eQn5DTGBWMsF3JyTE5Eycq8FGpEmqnrGogW2j55CVBDCOBo7VvTWm8a6tuh5TcQad_RVeiWXQ-0366Acjo4gB5br9DUycwEuKFTrEYbsEztR-ctUPhaQfBLXHNGjmrTRDjfxzF5v797mz0m8-eHp9l0nthMij4BZZSSFZPGSSuNlFzmWMuE4JNCSIAKg8PMGcEKAY45q1TNZVabXJhajMnVbi_6_VxD7PUSPUHTmBa6ddSCqSIvFSsKlE52Uhu6GBGAXqFXE7aaMz2A1gu9B60H0HoHGucu9yfW1RLc39QvWRTc7gSAj248BB2tB6TpfADba9f5f058A6Mukk4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087698077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adolescent-Preferred financial incentives to promote type 1 diabetes Self-Care: A discrete choice experiment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wright, Davene R. ; Chen, Tom ; Chalmers, Kristen D. ; Shah, Seema K. ; Yi-Frazier, Joyce P. ; LeBlanc, Jessica L. ; Garvey, Katharine ; Senturia, Kirsten D. ; Pihoker, Catherine ; Malik, Faisal S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wright, Davene R. ; Chen, Tom ; Chalmers, Kristen D. ; Shah, Seema K. ; Yi-Frazier, Joyce P. ; LeBlanc, Jessica L. ; Garvey, Katharine ; Senturia, Kirsten D. ; Pihoker, Catherine ; Malik, Faisal S.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to quantify preferences for the characteristics of a financial incentives program that would motivate adolescent engagement in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care.
We performed a discrete choice experiment with 12–18 year-olds with T1D from two pediatric hospital endocrinology clinics (n = 317). We identified key attributes of incentives: (1) monthly value of the reward, (2) payment structure, and (3) difficulty of incentivized behaviors. In twelve choice questions, adolescents chose the incentive option from a pair of profiles that was more likely to motivate them to increase adherence to recommended self-care. Options presented were tailored to adolescents’ T1D technology use and perceived difficulty of completing each behavior. We analyzed data using a conditional logit model.
The value of the reward accounted for 60.8% of preferences. Adolescents were willing to accept lower value rewards when incentive payments used positive vs. negative reinforcement (−$10.88 (95% CI: −$12.60, −9.24)) and preferred higher incentives for performing hard vs. easier behaviors (+$14.92 (95% CI: +$12.66, +$17.28)).
Stated preferences can inform intervention design. Future research will evaluate the external validity of the discrete choice experiment-informed intervention design by assessing adolescent health and behavioral outcomes in a randomized controlled trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-8227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111798</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39096938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Behavioral economics ; Child ; Choice Behavior ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - economics ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - psychology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - therapy ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Financial incentives ; Health incentives ; Humans ; Male ; Motivation ; Patient Preference ; Reward ; Self Care ; Type 1 diabetes</subject><ispartof>Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2024-09, Vol.215, p.111798, Article 111798</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e8a884b04ad4c4a44146e8a23315734eeb573d734da3073ed0dc88f142fa63af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111798$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39096938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wright, Davene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Kristen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Seema K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi-Frazier, Joyce P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvey, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senturia, Kirsten D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pihoker, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Faisal S.</creatorcontrib><title>Adolescent-Preferred financial incentives to promote type 1 diabetes Self-Care: A discrete choice experiment</title><title>Diabetes research and clinical practice</title><addtitle>Diabetes Res Clin Pract</addtitle><description>This study aimed to quantify preferences for the characteristics of a financial incentives program that would motivate adolescent engagement in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care.
We performed a discrete choice experiment with 12–18 year-olds with T1D from two pediatric hospital endocrinology clinics (n = 317). We identified key attributes of incentives: (1) monthly value of the reward, (2) payment structure, and (3) difficulty of incentivized behaviors. In twelve choice questions, adolescents chose the incentive option from a pair of profiles that was more likely to motivate them to increase adherence to recommended self-care. Options presented were tailored to adolescents’ T1D technology use and perceived difficulty of completing each behavior. We analyzed data using a conditional logit model.
The value of the reward accounted for 60.8% of preferences. Adolescents were willing to accept lower value rewards when incentive payments used positive vs. negative reinforcement (−$10.88 (95% CI: −$12.60, −9.24)) and preferred higher incentives for performing hard vs. easier behaviors (+$14.92 (95% CI: +$12.66, +$17.28)).
Stated preferences can inform intervention design. Future research will evaluate the external validity of the discrete choice experiment-informed intervention design by assessing adolescent health and behavioral outcomes in a randomized controlled trial.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Behavioral economics</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - economics</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - psychology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - therapy</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Financial incentives</subject><subject>Health incentives</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Self Care</subject><subject>Type 1 diabetes</subject><issn>0168-8227</issn><issn>1872-8227</issn><issn>1872-8227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEgjH4CaAcubQkTdamXNA08SVNAgk4R2niikxdO5JuYv8elw2unGzZr-3XDyEXnKWc8fx6kTpvqgAxzVgmU855UaoDMuKqyBKVZcUhGaFO_eQn5DTGBWMsF3JyTE5Eycq8FGpEmqnrGogW2j55CVBDCOBo7VvTWm8a6tuh5TcQad_RVeiWXQ-0366Acjo4gB5br9DUycwEuKFTrEYbsEztR-ctUPhaQfBLXHNGjmrTRDjfxzF5v797mz0m8-eHp9l0nthMij4BZZSSFZPGSSuNlFzmWMuE4JNCSIAKg8PMGcEKAY45q1TNZVabXJhajMnVbi_6_VxD7PUSPUHTmBa6ddSCqSIvFSsKlE52Uhu6GBGAXqFXE7aaMz2A1gu9B60H0HoHGucu9yfW1RLc39QvWRTc7gSAj248BB2tB6TpfADba9f5f058A6Mukk4</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Wright, Davene R.</creator><creator>Chen, Tom</creator><creator>Chalmers, Kristen D.</creator><creator>Shah, Seema K.</creator><creator>Yi-Frazier, Joyce P.</creator><creator>LeBlanc, Jessica L.</creator><creator>Garvey, Katharine</creator><creator>Senturia, Kirsten D.</creator><creator>Pihoker, Catherine</creator><creator>Malik, Faisal S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Adolescent-Preferred financial incentives to promote type 1 diabetes Self-Care: A discrete choice experiment</title><author>Wright, Davene R. ; Chen, Tom ; Chalmers, Kristen D. ; Shah, Seema K. ; Yi-Frazier, Joyce P. ; LeBlanc, Jessica L. ; Garvey, Katharine ; Senturia, Kirsten D. ; Pihoker, Catherine ; Malik, Faisal S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e8a884b04ad4c4a44146e8a23315734eeb573d734da3073ed0dc88f142fa63af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Behavioral economics</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - economics</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - psychology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - therapy</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Financial incentives</topic><topic>Health incentives</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Self Care</topic><topic>Type 1 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, Davene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Kristen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Seema K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi-Frazier, Joyce P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvey, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senturia, Kirsten D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pihoker, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Faisal S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetes research and clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, Davene R.</au><au>Chen, Tom</au><au>Chalmers, Kristen D.</au><au>Shah, Seema K.</au><au>Yi-Frazier, Joyce P.</au><au>LeBlanc, Jessica L.</au><au>Garvey, Katharine</au><au>Senturia, Kirsten D.</au><au>Pihoker, Catherine</au><au>Malik, Faisal S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adolescent-Preferred financial incentives to promote type 1 diabetes Self-Care: A discrete choice experiment</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes research and clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Res Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>215</volume><spage>111798</spage><pages>111798-</pages><artnum>111798</artnum><issn>0168-8227</issn><issn>1872-8227</issn><eissn>1872-8227</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to quantify preferences for the characteristics of a financial incentives program that would motivate adolescent engagement in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care.
We performed a discrete choice experiment with 12–18 year-olds with T1D from two pediatric hospital endocrinology clinics (n = 317). We identified key attributes of incentives: (1) monthly value of the reward, (2) payment structure, and (3) difficulty of incentivized behaviors. In twelve choice questions, adolescents chose the incentive option from a pair of profiles that was more likely to motivate them to increase adherence to recommended self-care. Options presented were tailored to adolescents’ T1D technology use and perceived difficulty of completing each behavior. We analyzed data using a conditional logit model.
The value of the reward accounted for 60.8% of preferences. Adolescents were willing to accept lower value rewards when incentive payments used positive vs. negative reinforcement (−$10.88 (95% CI: −$12.60, −9.24)) and preferred higher incentives for performing hard vs. easier behaviors (+$14.92 (95% CI: +$12.66, +$17.28)).
Stated preferences can inform intervention design. Future research will evaluate the external validity of the discrete choice experiment-informed intervention design by assessing adolescent health and behavioral outcomes in a randomized controlled trial.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39096938</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111798</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8227 |
ispartof | Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2024-09, Vol.215, p.111798, Article 111798 |
issn | 0168-8227 1872-8227 1872-8227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087698077 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Behavioral economics Child Choice Behavior Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - economics Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - psychology Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - therapy Endocrinology Female Financial incentives Health incentives Humans Male Motivation Patient Preference Reward Self Care Type 1 diabetes |
title | Adolescent-Preferred financial incentives to promote type 1 diabetes Self-Care: A discrete choice experiment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adolescent-Preferred%20financial%20incentives%20to%20promote%20type%201%20diabetes%20Self-Care:%20A%20discrete%20choice%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20research%20and%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Wright,%20Davene%20R.&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=215&rft.spage=111798&rft.pages=111798-&rft.artnum=111798&rft.issn=0168-8227&rft.eissn=1872-8227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111798&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3087698077%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087698077&rft_id=info:pmid/39096938&rft_els_id=S0168822724007083&rfr_iscdi=true |