Adolescent-Preferred financial incentives to promote type 1 diabetes Self-Care: A discrete choice experiment

This study aimed to quantify preferences for the characteristics of a financial incentives program that would motivate adolescent engagement in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care. We performed a discrete choice experiment with 12–18 year-olds with T1D from two pediatric hospital endocrinology clinics (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes research and clinical practice 2024-09, Vol.215, p.111798, Article 111798
Hauptverfasser: Wright, Davene R., Chen, Tom, Chalmers, Kristen D., Shah, Seema K., Yi-Frazier, Joyce P., LeBlanc, Jessica L., Garvey, Katharine, Senturia, Kirsten D., Pihoker, Catherine, Malik, Faisal S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to quantify preferences for the characteristics of a financial incentives program that would motivate adolescent engagement in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care. We performed a discrete choice experiment with 12–18 year-olds with T1D from two pediatric hospital endocrinology clinics (n = 317). We identified key attributes of incentives: (1) monthly value of the reward, (2) payment structure, and (3) difficulty of incentivized behaviors. In twelve choice questions, adolescents chose the incentive option from a pair of profiles that was more likely to motivate them to increase adherence to recommended self-care. Options presented were tailored to adolescents’ T1D technology use and perceived difficulty of completing each behavior. We analyzed data using a conditional logit model. The value of the reward accounted for 60.8% of preferences. Adolescents were willing to accept lower value rewards when incentive payments used positive vs. negative reinforcement (−$10.88 (95% CI: −$12.60, −9.24)) and preferred higher incentives for performing hard vs. easier behaviors (+$14.92 (95% CI: +$12.66, +$17.28)). Stated preferences can inform intervention design. Future research will evaluate the external validity of the discrete choice experiment-informed intervention design by assessing adolescent health and behavioral outcomes in a randomized controlled trial.
ISSN:0168-8227
1872-8227
1872-8227
DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111798