Limbal graft transplantation: a rare implementation in pediatric limbal stem cell deficiency

Purpose To evaluate limbal graft transplantation success in pediatric patients with chemical injury-induced limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) using the ‘LSCD Working Group’ staging system. Methods Medical records of 11 eyes of 11 children who underwent limbal graft transplantation (limbal autograft...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International ophthalmology 2024-08, Vol.44 (1), p.337, Article 337
Hauptverfasser: Korkmaz, Ilayda, Palamar, Melis, Timarci, Ilgin, Egrilmez, Sait, Yagci, Ayse, Barut Selver, Ozlem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate limbal graft transplantation success in pediatric patients with chemical injury-induced limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) using the ‘LSCD Working Group’ staging system. Methods Medical records of 11 eyes of 11 children who underwent limbal graft transplantation (limbal autograft/limbal allograft) were included. Surgical success was defined as improvement in the post-operative 1st year LSCD stage. Results The mean age was 12 ± 5 (4–17) years. Causative agent was alkaline in 4(36.4%) and acid in 3(27.2%) patients. Limbal autograft was performed in 9 (81.8%) eyes with unilateral LSCD, and allograft transplantation was performed in 2 (18.2%) eyes with bilateral LSCD. The mean follow-up time was 33.89 ± 30.73 (12–102.33) months. The overall limbal graft transplantation success rate was 72.7%. Among 9 patients who receive limbal autograft, 8 had improvement in post-operative LSCD stage, 1 had stable LSCD stage. Of the 2 patients who receive limbal allograft, post-operative LSCD stage remained the same in 1 and worsened in 1 patient. The mean time between injury and the surgery was 30.47 ± 30.08 (7–108.47) months. Penetrating keratoplasty was performed in 3 (27.2%) of 11 patients following limbal graft transplantation. Conclusion Management of LSCD in children is challenging and appears to be somewhat different from that of adults. Limited data in the literature indicate that cultivated or simple limbal epithelial transplantations (CLET/SLET) are primarily preferred in children. Although the tendency to take small tissue from the healthy eye is noteworthy, conventional limbal allograft and autograft transplantations also show promising results without any further complications in at least 1 year follow-up period.
ISSN:1573-2630
0165-5701
1573-2630
DOI:10.1007/s10792-024-03269-5