Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by transoral robotic surgery versus upfront surgery for locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis
Background Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising treatment for advanced‐stage oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) able to reduce the adjuvant therapy administration rate. Methods A retrospective bi‐centric study was conducted to analyze NAC + TORS...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Head & neck 2025-01, Vol.47 (1), p.175-188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising treatment for advanced‐stage oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) able to reduce the adjuvant therapy administration rate.
Methods
A retrospective bi‐centric study was conducted to analyze NAC + TORS versus upfront TORS patients. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups.
Results
Among the 300 patients with stage III‐IV OPSCC, 204 patients were matched for comparing NAC + TORS versus upfront TORS. Between the two groups, no significant difference was observed in recurrences and in survival for RFS, OS, and DSS. In the NAC + TORS p16‐positive population, adjuvant therapy could be spared in 51% versus 16% in the upfront surgery cohort (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1043-3074 1097-0347 1097-0347 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hed.27904 |