Suture closure AFtEr large bore vein access (SAFE‐VEIN): A randomized, prospective study of the efficacy and safety of venous closure device
Background Perclose ProGlide (PPG) Suture‐Mediated Closure System™ is safe and can reduce time to hemostasis following procedures requiring arterial access. Aims We aimed to compare PPG to figure of 8 suture in patients who underwent interventional catheter procedures requiring large bore venous acc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2024-10, Vol.104 (4), p.820-828 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Perclose ProGlide (PPG) Suture‐Mediated Closure System™ is safe and can reduce time to hemostasis following procedures requiring arterial access.
Aims
We aimed to compare PPG to figure of 8 suture in patients who underwent interventional catheter procedures requiring large bore venous access (LBVA) (≥13 French).
Methods
In this physician‐initiated, randomized, single‐center study [clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04632641], single‐stick venous access was obtained under ultrasound guidance. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1, and 100 subjects received allocated treatment to either PPG (n = 47) or figure of 8 suture (n = 53). No femoral arterial access was used in any patient. Primary outcomes were time to achieve hemostasis (TTH) and time to ambulation (TTA). Secondary outcomes were time to discharge (TTD) and vascular‐related complications and mortality. Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was used to compare TTH, TTA, and TTD.
Results
TTH (minutes) was significantly lower in PPG versus figure of 8 suture [median, (Q1, Q3)] [7 (2,10) vs. 11 (10,15) respectively, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.31173 |