Can β-blockers prevent intracranial aneurysm rupture? - insights from Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis
Hypertension is a risk factor for intracranial aneurysm rupture. We analyzed whether the intake of drugs from specific classes of anti-hypertensive medications affects hemodynamic parameters of intracranial aneurysm dome. We recorded medical history including medications and the in-hospital blood pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cardiovascular research 2024-07 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Hypertension is a risk factor for intracranial aneurysm rupture. We analyzed whether the intake of drugs from specific classes of anti-hypertensive medications affects hemodynamic parameters of intracranial aneurysm dome.
We recorded medical history including medications and the in-hospital blood pressure values. We then obtained 3D reconstruction of each patients' aneurysm dome and the feeding artery. Using OpenFOAM software we performed Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis of blood flow through the modeled structures. Blood was modeled as Newtonian fluid, using the incompressible transient solver. As the inlet boundary condition we used the patient-specific Internal Carotid Artery blood velocity waves obtained with Doppler ultrasound. We calculated haemodynamic parameters of the aneurysm dome. All presented analyses are cross-sectional.We included 72 patients with a total of 91 unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The history of β-blocker intake significantly influenced hemodynamic parameters of aneurysm dome. The patients on β-blockers had significantly smaller aneurysm domes (5.09 ± 2.11 mm vs. 7.41 ± 5.89 mm; p = 0.03) and did not have aneurysms larger than 10 mm (0% vs 17.0%; p = 0.01). In the Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis, walls of aneurysms in patients who took β-blockers were characterized by lower Wall Shear Stress Gradient (1.67 ± 1.85 Pa vs. 4.3 ± 6.06 Pa; p = 0.03), Oscillatory Shear Index (0.03 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.10; p = 0.04) and Surface Vortex Fraction (16.2% ± 5.2% vs. 20.0% ± 6.8%; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-6363 1755-3245 1755-3245 |
DOI: | 10.1093/cvr/cvae158 |