Weighing the risks and benefits: Parental perspectives on COVID-19 vaccines for 5- to 11-year-old children

Background: Parents are the primary decision makers for their children's vaccination, yet, we have limited knowledge on what influences their decision making related to COVID-19 vaccination. The study aimed to understand these different considerations that shape the decisions of parents of chil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2024-11, Vol.42 (25), p.126154, Article 126154
Hauptverfasser: Ataullahjan, Anushka, Piche-Renaud, Pierre-Philippe, Shahrbabak, Elahe Karimi, Fadaleh, Sarah Abu, Di Chiara, Costanza, Rodriguez, David Avelar, Peresin, Joelle, Morris, Shaun K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Parents are the primary decision makers for their children's vaccination, yet, we have limited knowledge on what influences their decision making related to COVID-19 vaccination. The study aimed to understand these different considerations that shape the decisions of parents of children aged 5–11 years old. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study that included online focus group discussions (FGDs) with parents of children aged 5–11 years old. Data was collected between July 26th, 2022, and February 15th, 2023. A total of eight FGDs were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted, and peer debriefing was used to ensure methodological rigor. Results: Findings revealed that parents of vaccinated and unvaccinated children employed language of risk-benefit analysis to inform their decision-making. Parents of vaccinated children highlighted concerns about spreading COVID-19, family member's health, and long COVID-19. For parents of unvaccinated children, they perceived potential vaccine side effects as more harmful than the risks associated with COVID-19. Participants contended that there was a lack of transparency from the government and public health agencies, highlighting inconsistent messaging which had fractured their trust in COVID-19-related recommendations and mandates. Conclusions: Our results indicate that improved transparency on how evidence is developed and why recommendations and mandates shift during the pandemic would foster trust in the government and public health agencies. Open communication with health providers on the potential risks and benefits would also improve caregivers confidence in the vaccine. •Parents undertook a risk-benefit analysis when deciding to vaccinate their child•Cultivating trust requires transparency on the impact of new scientific evidence•Parents desire open and individualized vaccination guidance from health providers
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126154