Concentrated growth factor intradermal injection assisted super‐thin flap expansion for repairing skin defects: A randomized, single blinded, split‐site study

Background The super‐thin skin flap formed by skin and soft tissue expansion has large area and good ductility, so it can be used to repair skin defects. However, because the flap is thin, the blood flow in the dermis of the super‐thin expanded flap is weakened, and flap rupture and necrosis after s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2024-11, Vol.23 (11), p.3716-3723
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Rongzhou, Yang, Sifen, Song, Meihua, Kuang, Baizeng, Li, Kun, Huang, Danli, Wang, Chunmei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The super‐thin skin flap formed by skin and soft tissue expansion has large area and good ductility, so it can be used to repair skin defects. However, because the flap is thin, the blood flow in the dermis of the super‐thin expanded flap is weakened, and flap rupture and necrosis after secondary flap transfer may occur. Objective To compare the skin thickness difference between the expanded ultrathin flaps injected with concentrated growth factor (CGF) and the blank group or saline group. Methods From June 2021 to December 2023, 10 patients (44 sites) with large‐area scars or skin tumors were treated, and a single center half randomized controlled trial was conducted. The test site of expander implantation was divided into three groups: intradermal injection of CGF group, normal saline group and blank group. The same amount of expansion was performed every 1–2 weeks, and CGF or normal saline was injected into the dermis every 4 weeks, a total of three times. After 2–3 months of expansion, color Doppler ultrasound was used to measure the skin thickness of each group. Results Compared with the blank group, the skin thickness of CGF group was 1.75 ± 0.08 mm, and that of BLA blank group was 1.42 ± 0.07 mm, with statistically significant difference (p 
ISSN:1473-2130
1473-2165
1473-2165
DOI:10.1111/jocd.16469