Perioperative outcomes in gynecologic pelvic exenteration before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program

To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before and after implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. We performed an institutional retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2024-10, Vol.189, p.80-87
Hauptverfasser: Huepenbecker, Sarah P., Soliman, Pamela T., Meyer, Larissa A., Iniesta, Maria D., Chisholm, Gary B., Taylor, Jolyn S., Wilke, Roni Nitecki, Fleming, Nicole D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before and after implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. We performed an institutional retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before (1/1/2006–12/30/2014) and after (1/1/2015–6/30/2023) ERAS implementation. We described ERAS compliance rates. We compared outcomes up to 60 days post-exenteration. Complication grades were defined by the Clavien-Dindo system. Overall, 105 women underwent pelvic exenteration; 74 (70.4%) in the pre-ERAS and 31 (29.5%) in the ERAS cohorts. There were no differences between cohorts in age, body mass index, race, primary disease site, type of exenteration, urinary diversion, or vaginal reconstruction. All patients had complications, with at least one grade II+ complication in 94.6% of pre-ERAS and 90.3% of ERAS patients. The ERAS cohort had more grade I-II gastrointestinal (61.3% vs 21.6%, p 
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.07.674