C4 monocots and C4 dicots exhibit rapid photosynthetic induction response in contrast to C3 plants
Considering the prevalence of ever‐changing conditions in the natural world, investigation of photosynthetic responses in C4 plants under fluctuating light is needed. Here, we studied the effect of dynamic illumination on photosynthesis in totally 10 C3, C3–C4 intermediate, C4‐like and C4 dicots and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiologia plantarum 2024-07, Vol.176 (4), p.e14431-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Considering the prevalence of ever‐changing conditions in the natural world, investigation of photosynthetic responses in C4 plants under fluctuating light is needed. Here, we studied the effect of dynamic illumination on photosynthesis in totally 10 C3, C3–C4 intermediate, C4‐like and C4 dicots and monocots at CO2 concentrations of 400 and 800 μmol mol−1. C4 and C4‐like plants had faster photosynthetic induction and light‐induced stomatal dynamics than C3 plants at 400 μmol mol−1, but not at 800 μmol mol−1 CO2, at which the CO2 supply rarely limits photosynthesis. C4 and C4‐like plants had a higher water use efficiency than C3 plants at both CO2 concentrations. There were positive correlations between photosynthetic induction and light‐induced stomatal response, together with CO2 compensation point, which was a parameter of the CO2‐concentrating mechanism of C4 photosynthesis. These results clearly show that C4 photosynthesis in both monocots and dicots adapts to fluctuating light conditions more efficiently than C3 photosynthesis. The rapid photosynthetic induction response in C4 plants can be attributed to the rapid stomatal dynamics, the CO2‐concentrating mechanism or both. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-9317 1399-3054 1399-3054 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ppl.14431 |